By Paul Onomuakpokpo
As the nation contends
with slumped economic fortunes that are mainly accruable from oil resources, it
makes hefty sense to contemplate fresh ways to source revenues to sustain the
operations of institutions. But increasing the cost of university education
that would be borne by students and their parents as recently proposed by vice
chancellors should not be one of these measures.
By proposing that
tuition-free university education should be abolished, the vice chancellors
under the aegis of the Committee of Vice Chancellors of Nigerian Universities
have only reopened an old debate. It is the right time for the debate because
it throws up the imperative to prudently manage resources so that there would
be enough to deploy in important areas of the nation amid the recession.
The economic crisis
has rendered the government at both the federal and state levels incapable of
paying workers and pensioners. Now, there have been lamentations about how the
paucity of funds has become a major impediment to the actualisation of the
great visions that different levels of government and their officials have for
the people.
Yet it is a wrong time for the debate because the same economic crisis that has
reduced the funds available for the government has also impoverished the
citizens. Indeed, since the citizens are the more adversely affected, vice
chancellors should not expect parents to get money to bear an additional cost
of university education. Is it the parents who have been rendered jobless by
the closure or relocation of their companies that would pay the tuition? Or is
it the parents who receive N18,000 minimum wage that would pay it? Even with
the universities operating the so-called tuition-free system now, is it all the
citizens whose children are qualified for university education that can afford
it?
The idea of stopping
the tuition-free policy should be jettisoned simply because of the poor.
Remember, most of these vice-chancellors and others who are canvassing the
payment of fees in universities enjoyed tuition-free university education. But
for this, most of them would not be where they are now. Those in the South West
during the government of the late Chief Obafemi Awolowo often recall with a
high sense of gratitude how his free educational policy made it easy for them
to go to school. Yes, the population of university students then was not as
much as we have now.
But that era did not
have as much resources as we command now.It is not because university education
is free that standards are low. After all, we pride ourselves on having one of
the best university systems in the world from the 1950s to 1970s that attracted
students and scholars from different parts of the world. But this great
university education was tuition-free. It was a time that university students
were fed with sumptuous chicken-laden meals and other needs of theirs were met
by the government.
Yet it produced great
scientists, administrators and writers, including a Nobel laureate. So interest
in learning is not exclusive to a generation, place or sex. Even now, despite
the much-condemned fall in educational standards, there are students who are
genuinely interested in learning. Or would the vice-chancellors agree that
because there are some lectures who are not ready to do their work therefore
all university teachers are bad? Or is it that since high fees are paid in
private universities all the students there are doing well? Far from it. There
are cases where parents have paid so much to send their children to private
universities but only for them to fail to cope with their studies. Even when
they are withdrawn to other private universities, they maintain this failure
streak.
Worse still, some turn
to crime and cultism. Just recently, there was the report of a student of a
private university who has been sentenced to death for killing his colleague.
Besides, have the policies of free education in countries like Norway , Austria ,
Germany , Finland and Sweden made their educational
standards low?
We live in a nation
where the citizens pay taxes but they live as though the government owed them
no obligation – they provide their own water, roads, electricity, security,
etc. For the majority of the citizens, they only can accept that a government
exists because it provides education.
But if this service is
removed, the citizens would only be more alienated. Besides, it borders on
self-sabotage if the government discourages the education of its citizens by
making its universities expensive. Many nations of the world that have recorded
giant strides in technological development invest so much in education. But if
it has become inevitable that through the abolition of the free-tuition system
funds would be freed for the provision of infrastructure, then some conditions
should be met first.
The government should
allow the economy to improve in such a way that gainfully employed parents can
pay the tuition of their children in the universities. The government should
strengthen its open university education system, create more awareness about it
and boost the confidence of the public in it. Part of the current
inferiorisation of the open university system is seen in the fact that those
with law degrees from it are not allowed to go to the law school. Yet there are
legal luminaries who got their law degrees through this open university system.
It is good that the vice chancellors have thought
of the need to help those who may not be able to afford the tuition. In this
regard, the VCs have suggested that the Federal Government should set up an
education bank. But this may not be a workable idea since an education bank
would only make some people richer. The purpose for setting up the bank would
be defeated through corruption. Those who genuinely need the money would not be
given. Instead, it would go to the cronies and fronts of bureaucrats through a
perverted quota system.
Again, the government
has to sufficiently convince the citizens that available resources are well
managed. How do we convince the citizens that the government cannot afford a
tuition-free university education system when our public officials are living
flamboyantly? The same government officials who would lament that resources are
lean are the ones who are receiving billions as security votes every month. And
at the end of their self-servicing tenures, they would continue with their huge
pensions, houses, cars and medical allowances for themselves and their
families.
Instead of looking up
to the government that has a history of shirking its obligations to the
citizens, the vice chancellors are the ones that would ensure that indigent
students are still accommodated if the tuition-free university education system
is abolished. One way to achieve this is through a work-study scheme. This was
done by the late Prof. Jelili Omotola at the University of Lagos
as the vice chancellor in the 1990s. Until all these measures are put in place,
any attempt to increase the cost of university education for the citizens who
are already impoverished by the official looting of the national treasury would
only provoke their animus towards the government and its agents, including the
vice chancellors.
*Dr. Onomuakpokopo is on the Editorial Board of The Guardian
A time should come in Nigeria when VCs [like University Presidents elsewhere] develop innovative or creative ways to mobilize public, private and community resources for institutional advancements in infrastructures, academics, research, endowments and revenue stream.
ReplyDeleteThe continuing reliance on Govts' periodic handouts is reflected in the woes and degeneration of the public institutions in all sectors as the SINGLE source support struggles.
Thinking out of the box may be a way forward for VCs; for example, it should be possible for some of universities to decide to convert into SINGLE or few products corporate entities where students are enrolled to focus on the knowledge and expertise for producing certain commercializable products or services that address critical national needs. The curriculum and training in such universities will be structured to meet the production or services needs.
Local and international corporate bodies and well as public agencies in charge of producing or supplying certain products/services in the country should easily buy into such an innovative university education. In addition, the students are trained as production or marketing managers by the time they graduate. Entrepreneurship can be heavily promoted by such an educational system as well. Furthermore, this approach will likely fast-track industrialization, production and export economy in the nation. Of course, a KEY requirement for a successful knowledge-based, production-focused university is REGULAR ELECTRICITY! Without this SINGULAR Utility, the aspiration for national industrialization, advancement in national R&D/innovation or push toward an export economy will continue to be a pipe dream!
Our VCs should try SOMETHING DIFFERENT to move Nigeria FORWARD!
GOD HELP NIGERIA. JUI [J
Joe Igietseme]