By Paul Onomuakpokpo
While the
plaudits tend to dim the caution against the danger of repudiating the
constitutional forts that guarantee the stability of our society in the guise
of prosecuting the anti-corruption campaign, we must keep on reminding
ourselves of the desiderata for the realisation of the vision of a transparent
society that President Muhammadu Buhari seemingly holds.
*Buhari |
As this
column has often stressed, there is no doubt that corruption is an enervating
plague that must be rooted out of our society to pave the way for an equitable
distribution of the wealth with which this nation is immeasurably endowed.
Yet, in arresting and
prosecuting the corrupt among us, we must guard against being befuddled by our
identification with the ruling party. It is such uncritical alignment that has
blurred the vision of those who should have declared the obvious excesses that
have smeared the anti-corruption campaign intolerable.
True, no one who is
keenly aware of the grim reality that the nation has suffered despoliation due
to the complicity of the corrupt guardians of the laws of the land would query
the raid on the residences of judges who allegedly have been living on sleazy
funds. Again, we cannot easily render impeachable the idea of the judges being
on suspension until they exonerate themselves from their alleged involvement in
practices that strongly detracted from their professional integrity.
Thus, the National
Judicial Council (NJC) may soon buckle under the pressure being mounted on it
to suspend the judges. The NJC may no longer bear being accused of complicity
with the judicial officers whose residences the Department of State Services
(DSS) raided for allegedly perverting the course of justice after being bribed
with dollars. Of course, apart from the DSS and the president, no one else
knows how compelling the incriminating evidence against the judges are. But to
save the judiciary from the moral absurdity of judges accused of corruption
presiding over cases of financial sleaze, they may have to be suspended while
their investigation lasts.
But it would remain an
ominous omission that mocks the anti-corruption drive if it is only the judges
that would be on suspension because of the allegations against them. This is
where the Buhari government must allow equity to lend credibility to the
anti-corruption campaign. The judges have alleged that they are being haunted
by the security agency of the government not because their professional
credibility is in question, but simply because they have refused to do the
obnoxious bidding of some of those in the ruling party.
Indeed, they did not
mince words. Justice Sylvester Ngwuta accused the Minister of Transportation,
Chibuike Rotimi Amaechi and Ogbonaya Onu of asking him to influence judgments
in their favour. Ngwuta alleged that Amaechi asked him to illegally remove
Ayodele Fayose of Ekiti State and Nyesom Wike of Rivers State
as governors. Before then, Justice John Inyang Okoro accused Amaechi of asking
him to pervert justice by making sure that election appeal cases for Rivers,
Akwa Ibom and Abia states favour him.
Thus, if the judges must be suspended because of the allegations against them,
Amaechi and Onu should be allowed to suffer the same fate. Buhari can no longer
gleefully hold on to his notion that none of his ministers is corrupt. Shortly
before Buhari formed his cabinet, there was a rash of allegations of corruption
against some of the people he was considering as ministers. But hiding under
the notion that the would-be ministers were not corrupt, they were shielded
from an investigation that would have either exonerated or indicted them.
In less than two years,
Buhari can no longer convince the citizens that members of his government are
immune to corruption. After all, Vice President Yemi Osinbajo recently
disclosed that all institutions of government are corrupt. Even if we are to
accept that Osinbajo only referred to institutions of government before May
2015 and thus the Buhari government is not corrupt, Amaechi and Onu have been
accused of corruption based on their past dealings in their previous public
offices. To be clear, what is emerging is that the Buhari government is being
enveloped in an atmosphere of corruption. Corruption in the Buhari government
has allegedly moved from the level of budget padding to that of brazen
stealing.
This is why questions
are being raised over the management of N12 billion allocated for the welfare
of internally displaced persons (IDPs) who are victims of the insurgency in the
North East. The allocation is being managed under the auspices of the
Presidential Initiative on the North East in the office of the Secretary to the
Government of the Federation (SGF). Those in charge of the budget are allegedly
not bothered that the IDPs are malnourished, suffering sexual exploitation and
wasting away in dingy camps. All they have been interested in is how to steal
the money. In the process, N270 million has allegedly been used to weed grass.
When the House of Representatives that is probing the allegation summoned the
SGF, Mr. Babachir Lawal ,to appear before it, he did not bulge. What could have
given him the boldness to do this if not because he knew that Buhari would do
nothing about his behaviour? If the judges must be suspended, Lawal and all the other people who have been
accused of corruption in the handling of the IDPs’ funds must also be relieved
of their offices. They must wait until they are exonerated before they return
to their offices.
Buhari’s
anti-corruption campaign must move beyond the level of going only after the
members of the opposition party. Despite the attempts of the Buhari government
to dismiss the notion that it is fixated on persecuting its perceived or real
political enemies, the accusation has never flagged. In fact, with the position
taken this week by former President Goodluck Jonathan, the notion of the
persecution of the opposition has been lent further force. After a lecture on
youth entrepreneurship at the Oxford Union in the United Kingdom , Jonathan declared
that his former National Security Adviser (NSA) could not have stolen $2.2
billon. For Jonathan, the allegation of the misappropriation of this humongous
amount in the midst of mass poverty is chimerical because he is secure in the
conviction that the money was used to buy aircraft, warships and arms during
his administration .
It is thus clear that
the Buhari government has much more work to do in fighting corruption than just
arresting and consigning the accused to detention. We cannot know who is really
corrupt now until the allegations against the accused are taken to an unbiased
court. This is why it negates the pursuit of justice when accused persons like
Dasuki are kept in detention for almost two years. With this challenge that
Jonathan has thrown to Buhari, his anti-corruption campaign stands the risk of
being discredited. But he can still save it by thoroughly executing it in line
with the laws of the land. And this should involve arresting and prosecuting
members of his party and government who have equally been accused of corruption.
*Dr. Onomuakpokpo is on
the Editorial Board of The Guardian
No comments:
Post a Comment