By Lai
Mohammed
Our attention has been drawn to
a story by The Economist, datelined Lagos
and featured in the paper's print edition of Sept. 24th 2016, entitled: ''Nigeria's
War Against Indiscipline, Behave Or Be Whipped''.
*President Buhari and Lai Mohammed |
Contrary
to the newspaper's self-professed belief in ''plain language'', the article in
question, from the headline to the body, is a master-piece of embellishment or
dressed-up language. It is loaded with innuendos and decidedly pejorative at
best, and downright racist at worst.
The
Economist wrote that President Buhari wants to ''tame''
Nigerians with the ''Change Begins With
Me'' Campaign. For those who are the owners of the English language, the
use of that word is unpardonable, the verb ''tame''
suggests that Nigerians are some kind of wild animals that must be
domesticated, and the usage reveals the mind-set of the authors of the article:
a deliberate put down of a whole people under the guise of criticising a
government policy.
The
paper, in striving to reach a preconceived conclusion, also insinuated that
some 150,000 volunteers are being trained as enforcers of the ''Change
Begins With Me'' Campaign. This is not true. In his speech at the
launch of the Campaign on September 8th 2016, the President, a
globally-acknowledged leader who believes strongly in the rule of law, left no
one in doubt that moral suasion, the very antithesis of force, will be employed
to achieve attitudinal change among Nigerians. In that speech, the President
said: ''I am therefore appealing to all
Nigerians to be part of this campaign.'' To the best of our knowledge and,
surely the knowledge of those who own the language, the words ''appeal'' and
''enforce'' are not synonymous.
In its
rush to discredit the ''Change Begins With Me'' Campaign, The
Economist, a widely respected newspaper, fell below its own standards
by choosing to be economical with the truth. Enforcement is not part of the
strategies to be employed under the Campaign, and nowhere has it been said that
the ''moral police'' will be unleashed, as reported by the newspaper. In
writing the story, the paper did not even deem it necessary to speak with any
official of the government, thus breaching one of the codes of journalism,
which is fairness. It chose instead to quote a ''critic'' of Mr. President in a
perfunctory manner.
Again, The
Economist made the same mistakes that most critics of the ''Change
Begins With Me'' Campaign have made: Rushing to comment on a campaign
they do not understand. The Campaign had barely been launched when the critics brought
out their big guns to shoot it down. In the process, many of them ended up
shooting themselves in the foot. Had they tarried a while to allow the
government to roll out the details of the campaign, they might have shown more
circumspection than they did in their criticism.
The
Campaign, which the President said ''will
help restore our value system and rekindle our nationalistic fervor'', is
not designed to shift any responsibility to Nigerians, as many have erroneously
said. It is an all-inclusive campaign that was designed to start with the
leadership. That much was explained by the President when he said the
government would ''drive the campaign'' and that it must be strongly supported
by all concerned individually. ''Change Begins With Me'' was designed
to start from the President, then trickle down to the Vice President,
Ministers, other top government officials and to all citizens. What is the
campaign asking Nigerians to do? Be the change they want to see in the society.
In
other words, if we all want an orderly society, for example, the motorists
among us must obey traffic rules, our aggrieved youth must stop destroying
public property, patent medicine sellers must stop selling fake drugs,
commercial vehicle drivers must stop taking alcoholic beverages before driving
etc. There is nothing extraordinary or over-burdening in all these. We are the
fundamental units of the society. If we are not willing to change our ways for
the better, we cannot expect a better society.
The Economist said
that from its earliest days, the paper had ''looked
abroad, both for subjects to write about and for circulation''. That means
the paper must be aware that many countries in the world have also embarked on
the kind of campaign that Nigeria
launched on September 8th 2016.
In 1979, Singapore
launched the National Courtesy Campaign to encourage Singaporeans to be more
kind and considerate to one another. In 2011, Mozambique launched a campaign to
educate students on how to treat foreign tourists as part of preparations for
the country's hosting of the All-Africa Games in that year. In 2015, China launched
a campaign to ''name and shame'' any of its own tourists who behave badly,
either at home or abroad. And this year, the Tokyo Good Manners Project was
launched to improve manners in the metropolis of the Japanese capital. It is
therefore uncharitable for The Economist to hide behind the
facade of its own prejudice to denigrate Nigeria 's genuine effort at national
re-orientation.
Alhaji Lai Mohammed
Minister of Information and Culture
Minister of Information and Culture
No comments:
Post a Comment