By Ray Ekpu
Hijab, the veil that Moslem women wear which covers the head and
the chest, is being gradually unveiled in
The
Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN) in the state says it will do two things:
appeal against the judgment and mobilise Christian students to turn up in
schools in their full religious regalia which will include choir robes and full
white garment ensemble, the trademarks of some of the feuding mainstream and
Pentecostal churches.
The State
Governor, Rauf Aregbesola, who has been in the trenches with his workers over
nonpayment of their salaries, is now in the eye of a different tornado. The
state government fully aware that the state may explode in a rage of religious
combat is now fretting like a fuzzy storm. The truth is that even though the
governor is a Moslem the state is almost evenly divided in population between
moslems and Christians and the invocation of the hijab as the ultimate
expression of fundamental human rights for female moslem students has convulsed
the state because the Christians suspect rightly or wrongly that this may be a
first step towards the Islamisation of schools in the state.
The security agencies have invited the Moslem and Christian leaders for a
meeting to avoid a breakdown of law and order. The twist in the tale is that,
truly speaking, these public schools are not public schools. They are schools
that were founded and funded by Christian missionaries which were forcibly
taken over by military governments when they ruled the roost. In some states,
these schools have been handed over back to their original owners but that is
not the case in Osun
State . That is perhaps
the meat of the matter.
The hijab
is gradually becoming a major subject of public discourse in Nigeria . It is
perhaps time to fully address or undress it. In December last year, a group of
Moslem youths under the aegis of Moslem Youths in Da’wab wanted the hijab
introduced into the National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) programme. They went to
the headquarters of the NYSC to protest against the ban of the use of the hijab
for female Moslem corps members during the orientation period. They said that
the rights of the female corps members were being infringed upon if they were
not allowed to use the hijab. The then Director General , Brigadier General
Johnson Olawumi, told them that he was a respecter of the rights of all corps
members but that the ban was for security reasons.
It did not apparently occur to these youths that the NYSC is a national institution that had been in existence since 1973 with its rules, regulations and a nationally identifiable uniform used throughout all the states of the federation. It didn’t also occur to them that since terrorists had made the hijab an instrument for suicide bombing something had to give if people’s lives were to be guaranteed by the NYSC authorities. It did not also dawn on them that in the hierarchy of rights the right to life is the pre-eminent right that stands atop other rights or freedoms. However, the Director General gave them a reason that was difficult to counter. They may not have been satisfied but they have been quiet since then.
*Gov Aregbesola |
Hijab is an
Arabic word that means “a screen or curtain,” according to Wikipedia. Three
scholars, Karem Armstrong, Reza Ashan and Leila Ahmed, have stated that
actually “the stipulations of the hijab were originally meant only for Prophet
Muhammad’s wives and were intended to maintain their inviolability. This was
because Muhammad conducted all religious and civic affairs in the mosque
adjacent to his home." The three scholars maintain that during the Prophet’s
life time no other Moslem woman wore the hijab. Aslon says that Moslem women
started to wear the hijab simply to emulate Muhammad’s wives who were revered
as “Mothers of the Believers” in Islam. She also states that there was no
tradition of veiling until around 627c in the Moslem community.
Some
Moslems seem to rely on the provision in Sura 33:53 as their authority on the
wearing of the hijab or veil: “And when you ask (his wives) for something, ask
them from behind a partition. That is purer for your hearts and their hearts.”
The three experts, Armstrong, Ashan and Ahmed, explain that this verse was not
addressed to women generally but to Muhammad’s wives specifically.
The reason for this was that the Prophet received and entertained lots of
visitors in the mosque which was then his home and he wanted to shield his
wives from these strangers. It is apparent that the Prophet considered privacy
as the most important attribute in relationships with the female gender, but he
did not seem to make it a prescription for all female Moslems.
The hijab
has been a source of controversy in contemporary times especially where the
authorities have enacted sharia laws. In Afghanistan , the Taliban
scrupulously enforced the wearing of the hijab. In their own case, they wanted
the women to cover their heads and faces fully because as they said the “face
of a woman is a source of corruption” for men not related to them. Weird, you
would say.
However, in
some of the more liberal Moslem countries there is a sensible moderation of the
hijab culture. In Tunisia , Turkey and Tajikistan , all of them countries
with huge Moslem populations, the wearing of the hijab is prohibited in
government buildings, schools and universities. In 2008, the Turkish government
tried to lift the ban on Moslem headscarves at universities but the
constitutional court overruled it.
In France
where there is a sizeable population of Moslems from north Africa, the French
parliament had to enact a law to restrict the use of the headscarves or other
“symbols or clothes through which students conspicuously display their
religious affiliation” in public primary schools, middle schools and secondary
schools.
The
pro-hijab fraternity in France
kept pushing for recognition of their fundamental rights but on July 13, 2010
the French Lower House of Parliament passed a bill into law by 335 votes to one
banning the wearing of the full hijab in public. This arose from the increasing
security concerns that the country was exposed to by some Moslem extremists.
The Osun
and NYSC cases in Nigeria
are indications that the pro-sharia titans are determined to push their agenda
to the limit despite the perils posed by blood thirsty insurgents. They are
also unmindful of the traditions of the public institutions that they seek to
invade with the hijab as the banner of religious freedom and fundamental human
rights.
The truth is that certain institutions have from time immemorial been arranged
for discipline and orderly conduct of affairs. These institutions include the
Armed Forces, the Police, NYSC, Customs, Immigration, Road Safety, schools and
several others. The uniformisation of these institutions is for the purpose of
discipline and exemplary conduct as well as an easy identification of the
brand. If the hijab proponents have their way, the women Moslems in our armed
forces will not wear their prescribed army uniforms but the hijab.
The
situation in Osun is a test case. If the various religious groups in the state
carry out their threats to send their children to school in uniforms of many
colours, then we will have a riot of school gears which will be an epitome of
indiscipline.
*Ray Ekpu, a veteran journalist, is former
Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Newswatch Communications
No comments:
Post a Comment