By Chuks Iloegbunam
Two things leap disagreeably out of President Muhammadu Buhari’s
first-year-in-office anniversary speech of May 29, 2016. In the broadcast’s
2624 words, not once did he mention the words Fulani herdsmen, let alone
address the real and present danger they constitute to Nigeria ’s
continued existence as one political entity. Was this unfortunate omission
because he is himself of the Fulani ethnic group? Or was it because he
considers a final stop to have been put to the herdsmen’s murderous rampaging
throughout the country? Or is it because the destructive army is a law unto
itself, above censure and sanction?
*President Buhari |
And this: “We are fully aware
that those vested interests who have held Nigeria back for so long will not
give up without a fight. They will sow divisions, sponsor vile press criticisms
at home and abroad, incite the public in an effort to create chaos rather than
relinquish the vice-like grip they have held on Nigeria .” In rendering the
above two sentences in the present continuous tense, wasn’t President Buhari
suggesting his government’s lack of total control, much in the manner of a monarch
unable to hold his goblet?
Sidelining the connotative meaning of these sentences as down to
clumsiness by presidential speechwriters, and also not minding the grammatical
mistakes in the speech, a fundamental worry is evident. Consider this: “They will sow divisions, sponsor vile press
criticisms at home and abroad, incite the public in an effort to create
chaos…” If you interpreted this official attribution of treasonous quality
to a robust media as the first decisive step to the systematic emasculation of public
opinion, your apprehension would sit on a solid foundation. Is it not often
said that truth – read an unfettered media – is invariably the first casualty
in any dispensation’s charted course to a repressive bastion? Suddenly, a
government that rode straight to power on the wings of the relentless and
remorseless media battering and badgering of the Jonathan administration is
talking about a “vile press”!
The “vile press” must, of course, have no future in this democratic
march, must not feature in the dynamics of change. So, let’s take a more
detailed look at the President’s broadcast, employing the instrument of content
analysis. “By age, instinct and
experience, my preference is to look forward, to prepare for the challenges
that lie ahead and rededicate the administration to the task of fixing
Nigeria,” said Buhari. Yet, about half the speech was on the past, rather
than an expatiating on the “triumph”, “consolidation”, and “achievements!” he
vaunted. He moaned about Boko Haram’s devastations. He moaned about the
collapse in oil prices. He moaned about decayed infrastructures. He moaned
about the preceding government that did not live up to expectation. You would
expect the elaborate exercise in threnody to be followed by his administration’s
rectifying “achievements!” That turned out to be a fatuous dream.
*Chuks Iloegbunam |
Let’s look at the details in terms of policy initiation and the
reversal of national dilapidation. The President pointed at his
administration’s thrust: “The problems
Nigerians have faced over the last year have been many and varied. But the real
challenge for this government has been reconstructing the spine of the
Nigerian state. The last twelve months have been spent collaborating with all
arms of government to revive our institutions so that they are more efficient
and fit for purpose:
*That means a bureaucracy
better able to develop and deliver policy.
*That means an independent
judiciary, above suspicion and able to defend citizen’s rights and dispense
justice equitably.
*That means a legislature
that actually legislates effectively and
*Above all; that means
political parties and politicians committed to serving the Nigerian people
rather than themselves.”
Very good! So, in what ways have the administration impacted
bureaucratic improvements? The broadcast does not answer this question. In what
ways have the administration promoted the independence of the judiciary? Since
this question is not answered either, Nigerians may draw conclusions from the
long list of judicial injunctions disregarded by the government. In what ways
have the administration promoted the ideal of a legislature “actually”
legislating effectively? It is not in the broadcast. When the President talks
about “political parties and politicians
committed to serving the Nigerian people rather than themselves,” what,
please, is the import? Collectively, wouldn’t the report of the National Confab
convened by the last administration better deal with these issues?
Take a look at the hoo-ha on fixing general decay. “The infrastructure, notably rail, power,
roads were in a decrepit state. All the four refineries were in a state of
disrepair, the pipelines and depots neglected.” So, to what extent has the
Buhari administration rectified the general decrepitude of his sustained
lamentation? How many kilometres of rail line has the government constructed?
What quantity of rolling stock has it imported? Not in the broadcast! Has the
government increased mega wattages even by an iota since its inception, or is
it not a fact that the country twice set a world record of zero wattage
delivery under its watch? How many kilometres of roads has the Buhari
government tarred? Not a single kilometre in 12 months. Of the four existing
refineries all of which were “in a state of disrepair”, how many are now of
improved capacity? Not one.
Well, it must be conceded that the Buhari government achieved
something in its first year! It identified 43,000 ghost workers through the
Integrated Payroll and Personnel Information (IPPI) system, saving the country
a colossal N4.2 billion in stolen pay packets every month. It also blocked
leakages in public expenditure, “boldly” using the treasury single account
(TSA)! But much-maligned former Finance Minister, Dr. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala,
introduced the IPPI during President Obasanjo’s second term, and the same lady
introduced the TAS during Jonathan’s presidency. But, again, hush!
Space stifles this submission because a book could easily be written
on the President’s broadcast. Suffice to sum up with a couple of comments. When
Buhari promises to “save Twenty-Three
Billion Naira per annum from official travelling and sitting allowances
alone”, it should be taken with a pinch of salt because he travelled abroad
36 times in his first year in office, each time with a large contingent. That’s
three junkets every month, which makes him about the most travelled President
in recorded history.
This first anniversary broadcast clearly delineates rhetoric and
achievement. And, “If the militants and
vandals are testing our resolve, they are much mistaken.” If unarmed
Biafran agitators are spotted, they must be gunned down! But, on the atrocities
of the Fulani herdsmen, a deafening silence…! Nigerians can only hope that the
speech to mark Change dispensation’s
second anniversary will be other than rigmarole.
*Chuks Iloegbunam, an eminent essayist and author is a columnist
with a national newspaper. He could be reached with iloegbunam@hotmail.com
No comments:
Post a Comment