ON any occasion when the facade of sophistication
and sensitivity to the needs of their fellow citizens crashes, our leaders
are often revealed as a people who are scandalously ensconced in a
notion of self-importance that negates the humanity of those outside the circle
of their socio-political and pecuniary influence. It is because they are
deluded by this warped notion that they do not mind neglecting the poor
citizens to wallow in their abject misery or deliberately inflicting on them
policies that would seal their pulverisation and reify their overbearing
sense of importance.
This is why our leaders steal the money meant for the improvement of the lot of the people, divert the funds meant for buying weapons and yet send soldiers to the battlefield unarmed. But the citizens still appreciate the true worth of the life of the average Nigerian. This was demonstrated in the past few days by the outrage they expressed at the abduction of the Bayelsa girl, Ese Oruru, who was forcibly Islamised and married at the age of 13.
This outrage did not come from the leaders of the society who were complicit in the ordeal of the teenager. It came from those outside the realm of power. And without this, those who had the power to set Ese free from captivity would not have bulged. But since there is apparently official complicity in the ordeal of the minor, there is the danger that beyond the outrage that has led to her release, the culprits would not be punished .
And there is a worse danger in so far as a lack of punishment would spawn a recurrence of this aberration. For the case of Yunusa is only a grim upshot of the failure of similar acts of impunity in the past to tug the conscience of the nation and pave the way for appropriate sanctions. If the Yunusas of our society are not merely serving as minions for some privileged persons, they have only demonstrated that they have learnt enough to appropriate for themselves an art their masters have deployed to satiate their lecherous appetites.
Was a former governor not cheered on by his
fellow senators when he prised a 12-year-old off the bosom of her mother in Egypt and brought her to Nigeria as a
wife? Was there a deterrent official umbrage when a traditional ruler
who ought to set the moral tone for his people acquired a minor like
a chattel and made her his wife? The Yunusas of our society are
abreast of all these scenarios. They know that the rich and
powerful having ravished the poor economically and politically, they go
ahead to prey on them sexually by coercing their children into marriage.
*Ese Oruru - The Victim |
This outrage did not come from the leaders of the society who were complicit in the ordeal of the teenager. It came from those outside the realm of power. And without this, those who had the power to set Ese free from captivity would not have bulged. But since there is apparently official complicity in the ordeal of the minor, there is the danger that beyond the outrage that has led to her release, the culprits would not be punished .
And there is a worse danger in so far as a lack of punishment would spawn a recurrence of this aberration. For the case of Yunusa is only a grim upshot of the failure of similar acts of impunity in the past to tug the conscience of the nation and pave the way for appropriate sanctions. If the Yunusas of our society are not merely serving as minions for some privileged persons, they have only demonstrated that they have learnt enough to appropriate for themselves an art their masters have deployed to satiate their lecherous appetites.
*IGP Solomon Arase |
Thus to avert a recurrence, all the dramatis
personae in this tawdry drama at the expense of the peace of the
Orurus must be served their well-deserved comeuppance. Nigerians are not
convinced by the attempts of the Emir of Kano, Malam Muhammadu Sanusi to exonerate
himself of blame over the development. If he had actually directed that
the girl should be released, why did he not follow up this directive? Or
is Sanusi saying that if Ese were his daughter all he would have done would be
to sit down somewhere and issue directives? The police must embark on a
thorough investigation to smash all the equivocations and arrive at the truth.
For in the first place, it is intriguing that Sanusi had a role to play in the
whole episode.
For if it is true that every person who gets married inKano reports to Sanusi
one wonders how he copes with them. But if this is not the case, then one
wonders why Sanusi was so much interested in this forced marriage. The whole
development betrays how the leaders in our society use their positions to keep
the poor perpetually in their bleak condition. For while the powerful
people in Kano would readily make their Sport Utility Vehicle available to
convey Ese to the palace of Sanusi amid police escorts and thereby created the
impression of closely guarding a prized asset, the same people would not lift a
finger to help Yunusa to improve his life educationally and economically. For
if these people who provided their SUV to convey the forced child-bride of
Yunusa were so responsive to his needs, he would not have gone to Bayelsa in
the first place to eke out a hard living as an Okada rider and Keke Marwa
operator.
Like most crimes which have been
committed in the name of religion, the sexual abuse of minors has often
been justified by appeals to religious sentiments. The refrain is always
that ‘‘our religion allows it so what is your business?’’ Granted that
members of a religion allow their children to be preyed upon by some
lecherous old men, the fact remains that this outrageous
practice should be limited to their fellow religious adherents. It is
scandalous that other people are being forced to change their religion in order
to make child-brides out of them. One may allow himself or
herself to be deluded by religion and validate the assumptions of Friedrich Nietzsche
who dismisses religion as the affair of the rabble or Karl Marx who describes
it as the opium of the masses. But the adherents of one religion must not
force other citizens to pander to their religious inanities.
For if it is true that every person who gets married in
*President Buhari and Emir of Kano, Sanusi Lamido Sanusi |
Some of these religious excesses are going on
because the state has not taken seriously the need to distance itself from
religion. Let the state restrict its role to only creating a peaceful
environment for the observance of the citizens’ religious duties. The
state should not be involved in the financing of religion. The government
at the federal and state levels should disband all pilgrims’ bodies. Instead of
boosting other countries’ economies through religious tourism, all the
resources that should have gone into sponsoring religious jamborees should be
appropriately deployed into developmental purposes.
Beyond this, a state functionary who is going
to Mecca or Jerusalem or any other place for a religious
purpose should foot that bill. In this regard, President Muhammadu Buhari can
set the tone by refunding to the coffers all the state resources he has
spent on travelling to Mecca
to pray. The citizens are not interested in how much he prays but the results
of the good governance he engenders that improve their lives. Besides,
the case of Ese has thrown into sharp relief how the so-called traditional
institution that is maintained by the tax-payers’ funds is used to oppress
the poor in our midst. Like religion, the traditional institution as
represented by emirs, obas and ezes should no longer be perpetuated
by state funds.
*Dr. Onomuakpokpo is on the Editorial Board of the The Guardian where he also writes a weekly column that appears every Thursday
No comments:
Post a Comment