By Ikechukwu Amaechi
My
daughter’s nanny, Mama Ike, came to work recently with a mischievous smirk on
her face. I couldn’t figure out what the matter was but it was apparent she was
excited about something. Then, she blurted out.
“Oga,”
she quipped, “Is it true that the president had run away?”
“Which president?” I asked her, flummoxed.
“Our
president, (Muhammadu) Buhari,” she riposted matter-of-factly.
“No,”
I told her. “It is not true. “He is on a five-day vacation.”
I
didn’t convince her as she held tenaciously to her piece of information,
literally accusing Buhari of going on AWOL.
“Oga,
are you sure? They said the man had run away ooo! In fact, the story in my
neighborhood this morning was that the man had run away. Some boys living in
our area said they had never seen or heard of this kind of thing before. That
the president of a country would run away from office.”
I
told her that it was not true but the incredulous look on her puckered face
told me without any scintilla of doubt that she was not swayed by my
explanation.
*President Buhari |
But
the fact that some people would spread such an absurd tale and some others
believe it about nine months into Buhari's 48-month tenure shows how fast the
confidence of the people in his ability to turn around for good their grim
fortunes is waning.
Nothing
exemplifies the dwindling reputation of the Buhari government more than the
2016 Appropriation Bill fiasco which the National Assembly (NASS) has
reasonably suspended until the Presidency sorts out the mess.
Each
day, it is becoming clearer that Buhari either does not have a clue (that word again) on what to do
beyond fighting corruption or is overwhelmed by the enormity of the mess the
country is in.
Whichever
is the case, the joke is on him, which was the lesson I took away from the
false claim that he had run away.
Yesterday,
the joke was on former President Goodluck Jonathan. He was clueless, naive,
timid and ineffectual.
But
no matter how hard the Buhari government and its supporters try, and despite
their chokehold on the media (mainstream and social), the joke cannot be on
Jonathan and his ineffectual government forever because the buck, to borrow a cliché,
now stops on someone else’s table – Buhari’s.
To
continue reminding us about the deep hole Jonathan dug the country into is
hackneyed. Nigerians knew that he was incompetent and weak and terminated their
social contract with him.
They
knew that had Jonathan remained on the driver’s seat, the country was headed
for a fatal crash and they took the wise decision of voting him out of office,
the first time a sitting Nigerian president would be so humiliated.
They
voted instead for Buhari because they thought he was everything that Jonathan
was not – a strong, decisive, effectual leader and an anti-corruption czar.
*Jonathan and Buhari |
Buhari’s
doggedness in actualising his presidential ambition since 2003 convinced many
that he knew where he was headed; he was focused and had a well-thought out
agenda that would pull Nigeria
back from the depths of mediocrity.
But
what has happened in the last nine months shows that Buhari laboured so hard
for 12 years to become president without any agenda. Before now, discerning
analysts averred that Nigeria
has leadership problem because we always had “unwilling presidents.”
The
country’s first and only Prime Minister, Tafawa Balewa, was seconded to Lagos while the real power behind the throne, Ahmadu
Bello, stayed back in Kaduna
as premier of the then northern region.
Shehu
Shagari, the first civilian president, was aspiring for the Senate in the Second Republic
when the powers-that-be anointed him president.
Olusegun
Obasanjo was in prison when the evil geniuses in the military (serving and
retired) decided he would be president. He initially rejected the draft, asking
how many presidents his benefactors wanted to make of him in one lifetime.
A
sick Umaru Yar’Adua wanted to go back to the classroom and teach after serving
as governor of Katsina
State for eight years.
When
the likes of Peter Odili, former governor of Rivers State ,
were crisscrossing the nooks and crannies of the country, buying the support of
traditional rulers and commoners alike, and Nasir el-Rufai and others were
embedded in Aso Rock in the succession intrigues, Yar’Adua was enjoying the
scenic quietude of his bucolic Katsina.
Jonathan
would have remained eternally grateful to his benefactors and thankful to God
for his good luck if he had served out his term as governor of Bayelsa.
I
am sure that before Obasanjo came calling, the idea of becoming vice president,
not to talk of president, would have sounded like a fairy tale to him.
But
Buhari is remarkably different. He wanted to be president and worked hard to
actualise his ambition. He changed political platforms – some of which he
joined, others he founded almost single-handedly, and some with others.
So,
is it likely that a man could aspire so fervently for a position for over a
decade without a well-thought out programme that would have enabled him to hit
the ground running?
The
answer, ordinarily, would have been a resounding no. But that seems to be what
is happening.
For
a man who coveted the Presidency for 12 years, it took almost six months to
constitute his cabinet even when it became fairly obvious long before the
elections that Nigerians were fed up with the bungling Jonathan Presidency and
were not likely to reward his failure with a repeat performance (apologies to
Gabriel Igbinedion, the Esama of Benin).
Buhari’s
excuse for not appointing ministers early was that they were noise makers and
he was comfortable sorting things out with civil servants by working with the
permanent secretaries. He told us that story in far-away France .
When
he got to the United States
where he announced that he would appoint ministers in September 2015, the story
changed. He said he was taking his time because he was looking for the “saints”
among us and did not want to make any mistake.
When
eventually he unveiled his ministerial list, some of us wondered why it took
him so long considering that there was indeed no surprise name on the list.
But
Nigerians gave their president the benefit of the doubt even when it was
becoming obvious that there was a creeping tardiness in the way the affairs of
the country was being handled by him.
Now
the huge budget mess. Even the most swashbuckling of the Buhari apologists has
come to the inevitable conclusion that the 2016 Appropriation Bill, the first
major assignment undertaken by this administration, has turned out to be a
blistering scandal.
Almost
every minister except, perhaps, Babatunde Fashola (former Lagos State
governor now minister of Works, Power and Housing), has disowned the budget.
A
month ago, it was the saga of the “missing budget.” Now Nigerians are being
regaled with sordid tales of how the bill was fraudulently altered, which has
compelled the NASS to suspend indefinitely its initial plan to pass it by
February 28.
The
government and its agents are blaming everyone except the Presidency. Who did
it? A “budget mafia” they claim. Corrupt civil servants, others scream.
Some
claim that the dubious budget proves that Buhari is fighting corruption. How?
Mum becomes the answer.
What
we have seen in the last nine months is the penchant by the government of
treating serious problems as molehills using the fight against corruption as an
alibi for its failings.
Any
other suggestion from any quarter, no matter how well-meaning, is dismissed as
proof of “corruption fighting back.”
The
government, using its well-oiled propagandist machine effectively manned by the
Minister of Information, Lai Mohammed, is living in denial.
The
danger is that sooner than later, such problems have the tendency of becoming
volcanic mountain-range eruptions.
*Ikechukwu
Amaechi is the Editor-in-Chief and Managing Director of TheNiche, a national
newspaper published in Nigeria
every Sunday. (ikechukwuamaechi@yahoo.com)
No comments:
Post a Comment