By Asikason Jonathan
” What had started as a belief was transmuted to total conviction;
that they could never again live with Nigerians. From this stems the primordial
political reality of the present situation. Biafra
cannot be killed by anything short of total eradication of the people that make
her. For even under total occupation Biafra
would sooner or without colonel Ojukwu rise up again”
– Frederick Forsyth
Let me start by disagreeing with Forsyth that apart from total
eradication of Biafran people that Biafran spirit cannot be killed. The problem
here is with the 1999 constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and what
Achebe described as the ‘Igbo problem.’
The 1999 constitution of the Federal Republic of
Nigeria did not only incorporates the colonial mistakes of 1900s which made the
Northern Nigeria a force to be reckoned with in the country’s politics
but it created also a leviathan out of the federal government to such a
nauseating level that the component units are seen as dependents and not
co-ordinates.
Many people have asked: what do Igbo people want? The answer is
very simple! We want political inclusion, we want a society where fair play,
justice and equity, rule of law and meritocracy reign – that’s just what Ndi
Igbo want!
The resurgence in the agitation for Biafra
lies on fact that the Igbo – 48 years after civil war – are yet to find their
bearings in the Nigerian federalism. We are yet to distinguish between the
dictionary and the political conception of the maxim: No Victor No Vanquished.
Let us not forget Ojukwu’s question: What
did he [Gowon] do to make the victor not being the victor and the vanquished
not being the vanquished?
*Odumegwu-Ojukwu
Perhaps, President Muhammadu Buhari’s insistence on carrying on
with what Chinweizu called Caliphate
Agenda regardless of who cries foul is the reason behind the resonance of Biafra . During late Umaru Musa Yar’adua’s government, not
much was heard about Biafra because the government considered Nigeria as a
single entity. He knew that if River Niger
was dredged, his countrymen from the lower Niger would benefit from it, so he
started the dredging process.
He knew that a government without an Igbo man playing a crucial
role was bound to fail so he put them in significant positions. Good policies
of Yar’adua’s attenuated the Biafra spirit
during his tenure.
Biafran spirit is still with us because nothing has changed
in Nigeria
since the civil war. The lopsided federal structure is still retained, the
North-South dichotomy is still active, rotational presidency is a tale of
unknown land, elections are still a fight to finish affairs and more
importantly, Nigeria remains a marriage of lovelorn partners.
The level of anger ravaging the Igbo youths today – majority of
whom did not smell the acrid smell of war, whom do not understand the
protruding powers of kwashiorkor, whom did not know the implications of late
Obafemi Awolowo’s post-war economic policies and what the term abandoned
property denote – stems from
today’s government ‘winner takes it all’ conception of power. This is done in the
crass ignorance of the compromise that always exists between the centripetal
and centrifugal forces of the federation.
*Nnamdi Kanu
It is Buhari’s proclivity towards alienation and marginalization
of the people that Rev. Bashen described as the ‘Ibos of Niger’ that made many
unemployed graduates, market men and women, motor park touts, the haves and the
have-nots to rally around the iconoclastic Nnanna Kanu- A new phenomenon in
Biafran Nationalism.
They trekked from Asaba to Awka and from Awka to Enugu , and from Enugu
to Owere. They grounded Port Harcourt and then
marched to Aba
in demonstrating their solidarity with Kanu and his IPOB.
Presumably, they were not bewitched by the magic wand of
Kanu but were moved by what Ted Gurr in his masterpiece Why Men Rebel‘ dubbed ‘Relative Deprivation and Frustration-
aggression’ impulses.
When there is a gap between what men seek and what seems
attainable, Gurr argued, men try to bridge the gap and when unable to do so,
they become angry and when they become angry the most satisfying inherent
response is to strike out at the source of the frustration. And this best
explains what IPOB adherents are doing.
If Buhari’s government is doing what is expected of it,
Kanu would neither have fame nor followers. But the government brimmed the pool
of opportunism for him to dive in.
Come to think of it, what’s in Kanu’s Radio Biafra that
will convince any reasonable Igbo man to agitate for Biafra if Nigeria is good
for him? The bottom-line is that Buhari created Kanu’s Radio Biafra by his
policies and created the demonstration – which might metamorphose into
revolution/ and or civil unrest by kanu’s arrest and continued detention.
Prior to Kanu’s Radio Biafra, we have one that is being aired
with the alleged technological assistance of Voice Of America (VOA) . The
broadcast here is matured and brimmed with intellectual engagements as well as
constructive criticisms on Nigerian government. Today, this Radio that the
Zionist Organization of B’Ephrayim was sponsoring has been supplanted by Kanu’s
riff-raff adventurism called Radio Biafra.
To soothe Kanu and his armies, the federal government must read
between the lines. It must dry out the pool of their anger. This should be done
by provision of employment opportunities – If all these young men are
meaningfully engaged in one work or another,they won’t have time to listen to
Kanu.
Buhari should diffuse the emanating centrifugal tendencies in Nigeria by
employing the constitutional principle of Federal Character in distribution of
powers and its appurtenances. The recommendations of the National Conference
should be given consideration.
To underestimate Kanu might be the greatest mistake of
the 21st century as it may usher in the beginning of the end of Nigeria . Buhari
as an old soldier needs not to retire to Aso Villa’s library to know that the
fire of revolution is always kindle by the downtrodden.
Using fire for fire approach would amount to an
invitation to war. Gaddafi was usurped and killed just because he locked the
doors to all rooms for negotiation. Buhari, why not quench this embers of
violence by retracing your steps.
Finally to my Igbo brothers: The earlier we define our aims and
aspirations the better for us. If Biafra is
what we want let us agitate for it vigorously and intelligently. If we still
want ‘One Nigeria,’ then we have to attenuate the Biafra
in us for proper political integration. Let’s stop engaging in what Igbo elders
of yore called ‘aju aro anya.’
*Asikason Jonathan, a public analyst,
writes from Enugwu-Ukwu , Anambra
State
No comments:
Post a Comment