By
Chuks Akamadu
THE current pro-Biafra wind blowing across
the length and breadth of south- eastern Nigeria and some contiguous parts
of the south-south geo-political zone reminds me of the timely warning of the
Emir of Kano, Sanusi Lamido. Not too long ago, the banker- turned traditional
ruler was reported to have cautioned the nation on the grave danger in failing
to pay proper attention to the worries of Ndigbo, noting that this generation
of Igbo youths would likely dare the Nigerian state in an unimaginable manner since
they neither suffer from a hang-over of the Nigeria/Biafra civil war – having
not witnessed it, nor do they harbor any memories of that darkest page of
Nigeria’s story book.
I would like to add that the present crop
of Igbo youths grew up with a be- ware-of-the-enemy-within mindset, a siege
mentality and a vanquished orientation, all of which combine to leave them in
highly inflammable state. To make matters worse, the environment where they
were nurtured was (and still is) rich in lack, rich in deprivation and rich in
hostility. It is little wonder, therefore, that they willingly received the
strange dogmatic exhortations of an Nnamdi Kanu and his Radio Biafra as food
(holy sacrament, if you like) to their drained souls.
Elsewhere, I had argued that who I see on
the streets clutching Biafra flag are not Biafran patriots – and they are not
Biafra enthusiasts either; they are frustrated youths who are at war with a
system that appears irrevocably committed to shrinking their individual
prospects of survival and forecloses their chances to prosper.
Fortunately for them, the Radio Biafra hate ministrations capture, in significant ways, both their corporate imagination and existential realities whilst Nnamdi Kanu’s present duel with the law has offered them a window for self-expression.
Fortunately for them, the Radio Biafra hate ministrations capture, in significant ways, both their corporate imagination and existential realities whilst Nnamdi Kanu’s present duel with the law has offered them a window for self-expression.
So, when an ex-President Olusegun
Obasanjo calls the Biafra agitators ‘miscreants,’ I laugh at his glaring
ignorance and poor understanding of the issues at hand, just as I have
understandable compassion for Gen. Yakubu Gowon (retd.) who has also dismissed
the brewing conflagration with a wave of hand. I said ‘under- standable’
because both share the luxury of having conquered Biafra in 1970 and can afford
to make light of the plight of Ndigbo – especially from a psychological standpoint.
If both leaders had, for instance, visited Aba recently and seen the deplorable living
conditions of Ndigbo who reside there, they would have appreciated the social,
sociological, economic and psychological dimensions of the cur- rent pro-Biafra
(mis)adventure.
Aba reminds me of old Maroko in Lagos; so I
do not understand how any man with a good head on the shoulder should expect
the average Aba resident to reason like a stable-minded, well-adjusted and
spiritually rational homo sapien. Nothing really can be more wishful, bearing
in mind that the Independent Peoples of Biafra (IPOB) youths are barely
educated and captives of starvation, with little or no hope of running into a
miracle any time soon.
But come to think of it, have we ever
paused for a moment to ask ourselves what could be the motivating factor(s)
that would make a teenager or a young man in his 20s trek from Awka to Onitsha
just to join a ‘Give Us Biafra’ procession? It can only be a function of
extreme discontent with a probable thirst for vengeance. We also should not
forget that given their station in life, these youths are incapable of
differentiating between a federal government responsibility and statutory
obligations of state governments.
That is why they put every conceivable blame
on federal government, including those for the failings of South-East governors
(past and present) who have, in mindless violation of the very spirit of
brotherhood, knowingly undermined every effort of theirs directed at
self-actualization.
From what I know, the late Ikemba Nnewi,
Chief Chukwuemeka Odi- umegwu-Ojukwu who for all practi- cal purposes embodies,
even in death, the Biafra struggle, ironically, had his casket wrapped in
Green-and-White- and-Green flag before his remains were committed to mother
earth. It, therefore, follows that he could not possibly have handed a Biafra
Actualization manual to anybody (Messrs Nnamdi Kanu and Ralph Uwazuruike
inclusive) before his transition.
This, of course, explains in part why the
present agitation could actually be described as a wrong-headed ‘advocacy’. The
last time I checked, nobody has done a SWOT analysis of the Biafra so
envisaged, no feasibility study and the agitators might actually not have had a
mental photo of what Biafra (as a sovereign state) would look like
economically, politically or socially. When they chant ‘All we are saying…give
us Biafra’, in their mind’s eye, what they see only is a geographical Biafra of
uncertainties, but with a belief that the emotional component of their agitation
would not only translate their newfoundland into a nation boasting of
territorial integrity, but also abundance of flowing milk and honey.
I have gone to this length to high- light
factors that have worked independently to predispose IPOB to their current
struggle. But much as I (a very proud Igboman no doubt) do not subscribe to the
modus operandi of the present agitation, much as I do not even share in the
philosophy (if any) behind it and much as I cannot bear the hate content of
Radio Biafra, I make bold to wholeheartedly identify with the discontent of
Ndigbo with the project called ‘Nigeria’ although I grant that the Igbo
leadership and elite cannot be exculpated. Theirs (IPOB) might not have been
the right or best approach, but truth be told, there certainly is a sense in
Ndigbo demanding, within the ambit of the law, greater accommodation in the
Great Nigeria House.
Federal government should not prevaricate
over this issue before it gets out of hand. The authorities should quickly
enter into a mutually rewarding dialogue with the agitators, and maybe this is
the time for the Nigerian union to come to terms with the imperatives of a
Marshall Plan for the South-East. It really is long overdue!
*Akamadu is a lawyer and public relations consultant
*Akamadu is a lawyer and public relations consultant
"The last time I checked, nobody has done a SWOT analysis of the Biafra so envisaged, no feasibility study and the agitators might actually not have had a mental photo of what Biafra (as a sovereign state) would look like economically, politically or socially. When they chant ‘All we are saying…give us Biafra’, in their mind’s eye, what they see only is a geographical Biafra of uncertainties, but with a belief that the emotional component of their agitation would not only translate their newfoundland into a nation boasting of territorial integrity, but also abundance of flowing milk and honey."
ReplyDeleteNext time, before you write, perform some research, because most of your assumptions expressed in this article are false. What you are observing is not spontaneous; more than ten years in the making. Nnamdi Kanu is not the leader, in any shape or form.
Chuks - good try and a nice write-up. However, the problem is, in the words of my brother Collins Ezebuihe, the train has already left the station. You are a lawyer and you know the castle rule. A man who has been chased from outside into his castle has no other place to run to, but to defend himself within his castle . With the prevailing condition for Ndigbo, your SWOT analysis I dare say is non sequitur. And as my bother Obi Nwakanma would say, there comes a time when a people, considering all their circumstances will say "No," with a thunder. That's where the Igbos are now
ReplyDelete