By Ikechukwu Amaechi
I am
an advocate of merit. I believe that part of the problem of the country is that
we have perfected putting square pegs in round holes. We sacrifice excellence
on the altar of primordial mawkishness and nepotism with disastrous
consequences.
I refrained
from commenting before now on President Muhammadu Buhari’s appointments which
favour the North more than the South because I thought it was too early to
start reading meanings into his actions.
His critics
allege that there is a tinge of clannishness in all his appointments. These
allegations are not new. He failed in his earlier attempts to become the chief
tenant of Aso Rock because of the perception that he has a mindset that is not
nationally inclined.
Many
Nigerians, particularly those from the South, distrusted Buhari. He is
perceived to be too cliquish, narrow and insular in his worldview despite his
military background.
While many
voters still perceived him in that light as they cast their ballots on March
28, there was a significant number that believed, not necessarily that he was a
changed man as he had claimed, but that he should be given the benefit of the
doubt.
In any case,
most Nigerians had come to the inevitable conclusion long before the election
that returning the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) with Goodluck Jonathan as its
presidential flag bearer to power was drinking hemlock.
So, the
pan-Nigeria goodwill that propelled Buhari to power was more of a no-confidence
vote in Jonathan and the PDP, particularly in the South.
But two
months after assuming power, even those who believed that he was a changed man,
a nationalist who sees the whole of Nigeria as his constituency, are beginning
to ask themselves if they had not made a mistake.
I have always
believed in Buhari, arguing at great political cost that he is a misunderstood
man who is not vindictive.
I have come
down hard on those who accuse him of being guided by ethnic considerations in
the appointments he has made so far, insisting that it is still early in the
day to conclude.
But I am no
longer sure of what to believe about the Buhari Presidency and whether he can
rise above primordial tendencies to be the national leader Nigerians expect him
to be.
My doubt was
provoked by the game of musical chairs at the Nigerian Maritime Administration
and Safety Agency (NIMASA) recently.
On Tuesday,
July 21, Buhari announced the termination of the appointment of Patrick
Akpobolokemi as the Director General and Chief Executive Officer of NIMASA.
The sack,
announced by Buhari’s Media Adviser, Femi Adesina, was with immediate effect.
Akpobolokemi was directed to hand over to the most senior officer in the agency
who will remain in charge until the appointment of a new DG.
NIMASA issued
a statement the same day through the Deputy Director and Head of Public
Relations, Isichei Osamgbi, announcing Callistus Obi (Executive Director,
Maritime Labour and Cabotage Services), as acting DG and CEO. Akpobolokemi
handed over to him.
Four days
later, on July 25, the same NIMASA, acting on the directive of the Presidency,
announced Haruna Jauro (Executive Director Finance and Administration), as the
new acting DG. Jauro formally took over from Obi on Monday, July 27.
Why was Jauro
preferred to Obi? Definitely, the decision was not taken based on seniority or
competence. Both Obi and Jauro were appointed by former President Goodluck
Jonathan on July 24, 2012.
Born in 1964,
Obi studied law at the University
of Nigeria , Nsukka and
was called to the Bar in 1991. He is a member of the Nigerian Bar Association
(NBA), International Bar Association, and Fellow, Chartered Institute of
Secretaries and Administrators.
There is
ample evidence in NIMASA to prove that he is not lacking in competence.
So, the only
reason why he was dropped was that he is a Southerner. Worse still, he is Igbo,
from a zone where Buhari garnered only 5 per cent of the votes in the
presidential election.
This decision
is too petty and unbecoming of the highest office in the land.
Coming
shortly after Buhari was quoted as saying during his recent trip to the United States
that he will reward regions that voted for him before others, his action cannot
be seen as anything other than vendetta.
Answering a
question on how he intends to deal with issues in the Niger Delta, particularly
amnesty, bunkering and inclusive development, Buhari reportedly said: “Going by
election results, constituencies that gave me 97 per cent cannot in all honesty
be treated on some issues, with constituencies that gave me 5 per cent.
“I think
these are political realities. While certainly there will be justice for
everybody but the people who voted and made their votes count, they must feel
the government has appreciated the effort they put in putting the government in
place. I think this is really fair.”
This mindset
is dangerous. The country can ill-afford a president who thinks he is only in
office to serve those who voted for him. And the reason is simple.
The values
and resources the president allocates on behalf of the Nigerian state by virtue
of the position he occupies belongs to all of us and not only those who voted
for him and “made their votes count.”
Those who did
not vote for him, or who voted for him but could not make their votes count
because they were overwhelmed by the coercion unleashed against them by the
Nigerian state, as happened in some parts of the South South and South East,
are entitled to the country’s patrimony as of right. It is not a privilege.
Buhari’s
victory in the election was not a landslide. He won by only 2.57 million votes,
according to the official result announced by the Independent National
Electoral Commission (INEC).
He won
15,424,921 votes or 53.95 per cent of the 28,587,564 total valid votes cast.
Jonathan won 12,853,162 (44.96 per cent).
So, is Buhari
going to exclude 45 per cent of the population from their heritage because they
preferred a candidate other than himself?
Has it also
occurred to him and those bent on excluding some sections of the country from
governance that though he may have received only 5 per cent of the votes in the
South South and South East, the Rotimi Amaechis, Chris Ngiges, Ogbonnaya Onus,
et al, took far more political risks supporting him and are bound to pay a
steep political price even with his victory than the Rabiu Kwankwasos, Nasiru
el-Rufais, et al, from those zones where he scored the fabled 97 per cent?
This winner
takes all mentality is at the root of most political crises in the country. It
also explains why politics has become a do-or-die affair.
It will be
too sad if Buhari, by his actions and inactions, proves right those who believe
that a chameleon can never change its spots.
*Amaechi is the Managing Director/Editor-in-Chief of TheNiche newspaper, Lagos.
No comments:
Post a Comment