Two interesting incidents that played out on the international scene recently clearly underlined the profound confusion of values that has crept into Western policies and attitudes towards President Robert Mugabe of
*Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe And His Wife, Grace... |
At Victoria Falls, on the border of Zambia and Zimbabwe ,
where Sata and Mugabe met to sign an agreement with the UNWTO Secretary
General, Taleb Rifai, Mugabe must have been surprised and elated to hear Rifai
say this about his own Zimbabwe :
"I was told about
the wonderful experience and the warm hospitality of this country … By coming
here, it is a recognition, an endorsement on the country that it is a safe
destination."
Following this May 28,
2012 agreement, Zambia and Zimbabwe will
jointly host the UNWTO general assembly in August 2013.
Reactions to this
development were prompt and unsparing. Human rights groups across the world and
government functionaries in EU countries condemned it in very strong terms,
just as Canada immediately
announced its decision to withdraw from the UNWTO. But while Canada maintained
that Mugabe’s appointment was the key factor that inspired its decision to
terminate its membership of the global body, UNWTO stated that Canada had
already withdrawn its membership two weeks before Mugabe was invited to join
the body.
According to a report
in the Embassy – Canada ’s
Foreign Policy Newspaper , Canada had
on May 12, 2011, “formally communicated to the UNWTO, in a letter not made
public, that it wanted to withdraw its full membership in the agency, according
to Sandra Carvao, the UNWTO’s communications chief. It didn’t say why.
‘According to UNWTO Statutes, withdrawal is effective one year after the formal
notice (12 May 2012),’ wrote Ms. Carvao in an email to the Embassy May
31.”
*Ugochukwu Ejinkeonye |
And while the
controversy raged, the UNWTO weighed in with a “clarification” that smells and
tastes like an after-thought. It denied that it had made Mr. Mugabe a tourism
ambassador stressing that the same letter it sent to him was equally “sent to
all heads of state and government worldwide and aims to raise awareness of the
potential of tourism for development, job creation and economic growth.” Well,
no matter what the UNWTO chooses to say it did or did not do, what cannot be
denied is that Zimbabwe and Zambia will
jointly host the UNWTO general assembly next year, with Mugabe starring
prominently and savouring positive global spotlight.
The world was still
trying to come to terms with this development, when by mid-July, the media went
to town with screaming headlines that the European Union (EU) has announced its
intention to lift sanctions on Zimbabwe, some of which were targeted at
Mugabe and his inner circle players. The Telegraph (UK )
quoted a Foreign Office spokesperson as saying that changing situations in Zimbabwe had
compelled the EU to review its position.
“Since these measures
were last reviewed in February we have heard a number of calls, including from
the MDC-T and their partners in the Inclusive Government, for us to show
flexibility in order to support the process of reform. For us what matters is
putting in place what's needed for free and fair elections, in line with the
requirements of the EU Measures, and meeting the key points of progress that
are promised along the way,” the spokesperson said.
*Zambian President Michael And Robert Mugabe |
If the EU expected
this gesture to provoke jubilations in Harare ,
it must have been sorely disappointed. Spokesman for Mugabe’s party, the Zimbabwe African
National Union-Patriotic Front (ZANU-PF), Rugare
Gumbo, underlined the party’s suspicion of this move, accusing the EU of
harbouring “an agenda to weaken Zanu-PF,” adding rather defiantly that such a
move “will not work. We will always get help from the East (Asia ).”
The party thinks the EU’s real intention is to position itself properly to
influence the next election against it.
Now, even though
Mugabe has a very fashion-conscious wife whose love for designer dresses and
jewelries is widely acknowledged, was it not naïve of the UK and
the EU to think that the Zimbabwean president must have been having sleepless
nights over his inability to holiday and shop in London or Paris ?
No doubt, the 88 year-old fox in Harare knows
full well that bitterness in the UK towards
him is still very deep mainly because of his “land reforms” which had displaced
white farmers from their vast farmlands and forced many of them to leave the
country. Securely wrapped in his memory, too, is the disastrous fate of his
late friend, Muammar Gaddafi, who had allowed himself to be seduced by similar
gestures of rapprochement from the West, only to soon realize that it is only
the foolish butterfly that hastens to think that by flying like a bird, it has
become a bird, instead of a bird’s prey. Indeed, Mugabe knows that the only
thing that can assuage the US and EU strong feelings against him is an
opportunity to humiliate him out of power, pick him up immediately and parade
him helpless, handcuffed and grossly diminished before the world, and then
finally liquidate him at The Hague with an overdose of the Charles Taylor
treatment.
Mugabe told CNN’s
Christiane Amanpour in 2009 that the United States and Britain are hell-bent on
successfully executing what he calls their “regime change programme” in
Zimbabwe which he says, “is aimed at getting not just Robert Mugabe out of
power, but Robert Mugabe and his party out of power?” And that “naturally
means,” he said, that “we dig in, remain in our trenches.”
Now digging in and remaining in their trenches
have been at a very grave cost to Zimbabwe and
its people. Mugabe is a man ruled by fear – the fear of tomorrow; the fear of
losing power and the great security and grandeur it provides him. And so,
whoever he considers, rightly or wrongly, as a possible tool in the hands of
his enemies (read the US and UK )
to bring him down is visited with the worst kind of ruthlessness. Thus, a reign
of terror has become the worst nightmare of Zimbabweans, with human rights
violations reaching unprecedented heights. Whether the situation would still
have degenerated so badly, if Western powers were not breathing down his neck
in their desperation to achieve a “regime change” and teach Mugabe a lesson of
his life, would make an interesting study.
*Taleb Rifai, UNWTO Secretary General |
But the painful reality is that Zimbabweans
have suffered terribly under Mugabe, and his vigorous attempts to explain it
away remains exasperating, especially, as it is public knowledge that himself,
family and cronies are insulated from the unimaginable suffering Zimbabweans
have been through under his watch. In due time, he ought to be called to
account, but what many people are not agreed upon is whether that should happen
at the International Criminal Court (ICC) sitting at the Hague, which ought to
have been named the “Special Court for African Leaders Who Fell Out With the
West.”
The problem with this court is that whereas it
kindles hope in Africans that there is now a judicial platform with the
capacity to duly prosecute their errant leaders and serve as deterrent to
others, there is also this unavoidable feeling of sadness and humiliation
arising from what the existence and nature of this same court say about them
and their place as Africans in the world. Now did Robin Cook, former British
Foreign Minister, not say the following about the ICC on BBC
Newsnight some years ago: “If I may say so,
this is not a court set up to bring to book prime ministers of the United
Kingdom or Presidents of the United States.”
Now, one can really understand why this court
is circulating serious discomfort across Africa .
And one may even ask: Would Robert Mugabe be today hounded by Western powers
and targeted for an indictment at The
Hague if he did not undertake
the Zimbabwean “land reforms” which displaced the white farmers from their vast
farmlands, even if he was operating the worst repressive regime in Africa ?
Indeed, it is difficult to sell the viewpoint that it is the concern and care
about democracy and the suffering of poor black Zimbabweans that are fueling
the current global anti-Mugabe strong feelings. Well, Mugabe is even out there
boasting that he had to fight a crude, repressive, British colonial regime to
bring democracy to Zimbabwe, so who should preach democracy and human rights to
the other, he appears to be asking. Postures like these have helped to deepen
the estrangement and mutual dislike between Mugabe and his erstwhile friends.
*Ms. Fatou Bensouda, ICC Chief Prosecutor |
In the Western world, frustration is setting
in due to the failure of every effort, overt and subterranean, to bring Mugabe
down. The Movement for Democratic Change (MDC)’s leader, Morgan Tsvangirai,
despite massive Western support has only managed to become the weaker party in
a power-sharing arrangement brokered for Zimbabwe by South
Africa after
the disputed 2008 elections. And with the hope of democratically unseating
Mugabe and his ZANU-PF dimming with each passing day, and Tsangirai appearing
increasingly uncomfortable with being widely labeled a Western stooge,
predictions about the likely situations that may emerge are becoming pretty
difficult.
Incidentally, Zimbabwe ’s
economy appears to be showing signs of recovery, thus denying the West another
very potent tool it has so far deployed in its overwhelming campaign against
Mugabe. In fact, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) in November 2010 stated that Zimbabwe was
"completing its second year of buoyant economic growth.”
*Prince Philip, President Robert Mugabe And Queen Elizabeth II Of England |
With many years gone already and
the ever defiant Mugabe ageing gracefully, with Zimbabwe and its rich minerals
still in his grip, strong yearning for his downfall appears to have given way
to desperate expectations of his death. And so, each time Mugabe jets out to
Singapore for what his spokespersons tersely describe as “routine medical check
up” the Western media would go frenzy with screaming headlines about a sick and
dying Mugabe. The most embarrassing happened last April. Following a rumour by
an obscure Zimbabwean online newspaper, virtually all the major and minor
papers from London to New York and the rest of the world celebrated with
screaming headlines that Mugabe was down with prostate cancer “dying” or
“fighting for life” in a Singapore hospital. Some even reported that he had
named a successor. But as a lively Mugabe flew into Harare a
few days later and emerged from the aircraft looking (in his own words) “as fit
as fiddle,” the embarrassment was monumental within Western media circles.
When Zimbabwe won
independence from Britain in
1980, Mugabe was a darling of the West especially, the UK ,
which promptly awarded him an honorary knighthood. He made enchanting
reconciliatory speeches and gestures at the end of the bitter liberation war
from which Britain was able to reassure itself that Mugabe would be always be
trusted to remain a “good boy,” and would never undertake any measures that
would affect British interests in Zimbabwe where a tiny minority of white
settlers controlled a greater portion of farmlands to the great disadvantage of
the vast majority of black Zimbabweans. (This was despite Mugabe’s claims that
at the Lancaster House discussions, they had agreed with the British that there
would be “land reforms.”) And for the next ten years, while Mugabe undertook
policies that ushered the country into prosperity in manufacturing, mining,
agriculture etc., he was celebrated by the global media and feted in Western
capitals from where glowing tributes always flooded his doorsteps.
It is widely
believed that Mugabe’s land reforms which largely contributed to his present
troubles with the Western world were not totally informed by patriotic motives
– to let black Zimbabweans benefit from equitable redistribution of the lands.
Those who hold this view point to the fact that the recovered lands ended up
mostly in the hands of his cronies and fellow war veterans. The belief was that
the land reform policy was a desperate political move to consolidate his hold
on power at a time it appeared to be slipping from his hands. And this has
proved a very costly decision for him and his country. Indeed, Zimbabwe has
practically passed through the valley of the shadow of death.
*MDC-T Leader And Zimbabwean Prime Minister, |
And now that Mugabe’s
relationship with the West has further worsened, he has begun to respond to new
advances from eager suitors from the East. These have now come in with ideas
and projects to stimulate growth in Zimbabwe .
In February 2011, Zimbabwean authorities announced that the Chinese will over
the next five years undertake in the country massive investments worth $10
billion dollars (£6.19bn). This sounds like a huge windfall, although more
discerning minds would rather see what is happening as replacing the much
despised British economic domination with that of the Chinese. Reports abound
of how Zimbabweans who work with these Chinese are treated like slaves in their
own country, while Mugabe is out there boasting that situations are a lot
better in his country. Indeed. Although about two years ago, a Zambian friend
showed me a 40 billion Zimbabwean dollar bill which he said could not buy a
loaf of bread, what is clear is that Zimbabwe appears
to have, at least, discovered the path to economic discovery. And with this,
Mugabe and his ZANU-PF would even dig in further and remain in their trenches
till the bitterest end.
Could it be then that
these developments are causing the Western world to rethink its terms of
engagement with Mugabe in order not to lose out to their competitors from the
East in the mad scramble for Africa ?
Is this new thinking and attitude represented in the seemingly panic and
confused gestures we saw in the UNWTO appointment and the EU’s moves to lift
sanctions on Zimbabwe ?
Is Mugabe then having the last laugh?
A reader in South
Africa posted
this comment on an online report about the UK and
EU decision to lift sanctions on Mugabe:
“The British
Government does not act out of charity. It is scrapping sanctions on Mugabe because Britain needs
Mugabe more than Mugabe needs Britain .
It may not be about the oil stupid! But it certainly is about the 40 other
exploitable minerals sitting under Uncle Bob's feet. The 4000 or so white
farmers that must be disgusted by this are mere "collateral damage"
in the war for Zimbabwe 's
resources. Remember why Mugabe is hated, he gives land and minerals to the
black poor. Highly inconsistent with the UK ’s
extractive multinational capitalist approach.”
* Robert Mugabe Enjoying A Laugh Behind The British Queen Elizabeth |
Quite interesting, but what then happens to
Mugabe’s horrible human rights record over which the Western world has raised
ear-splitting cries? Across the world, many regard him as a mass murderer who
should be tried in an open and unbiased court and made to pay severely for his
crimes if found guilty?
Will he now go free
just because the West was unable to extract its pound flesh from him or will he
have his day in a Zimbabwean court some day, soon? Or will his eventual
successful reconciliation with the West (though he appears to be meanwhile
playing Andrew Marvell’s “His Coy Mistress”) simply obliterate those horrible
records against him name? When will Africa develop
the capacity to bring rogue African leaders to book on its own soil and for its
own good? This should provoke a lot of serious thinking in Africa .
----------------------------
Robert Mugabe must be tried for all his atrocities. But it should not happen at ICC sitting at The Hague or any Western Court that was specially set up for Africans. It should be in Zimbabwe, by Zimababweans and for Zimababweans.
ReplyDeleteMugabe seems to be having the last laugh because of the greed and hypocrisy in the West. And that he might eventually get away with all his crimes just because he continues to play smart is the most annoying aspect. Robert Mugabe is a bad model in Africa who appears to be pushing his luck dangerously too far. The West is baiting him and he seems to be the winning party meanwhile. But is it not a huge shame that Africa continues to lack the powers and mechanisms to rein in its rogue leaders, leaving the West to do the dirty job and also diminish continent in the process.
ReplyDeleteThe Grace Mugabe Interview.
ReplyDeleteIt is good to hear such no-holds-bar interview from one of the most controversial president's wives in Africa...
WATCH THE VIDEO HERE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9VIYSnVoEow