By Kenechukwu Obiezu
The concerned citizens who have over the years painfully followed
the bloody mindless Kaduna State were hit with another sucker punch the other
day: The Governor of Kaduna State and its Chief Security Officer, Nasir Ahmad
El-Rufai declared that he had paid Fulani herdsmen money to stop their attacks
on long-suffering indigenes of Kaduna State, especially the Christian-dominated
area of southern Kaduna.
Given his
eccentricities and insatiable thirst for controversy, those who have followed
his colourful political career from when he held the office of the Honourable
Minister, FCT during which time countless buildings fell and countless families
were rendered homeless controversially, to implement the Abuja Master Plan, to
his current stint as Governor of Kaduna State, have never been starved of drama
and unpredictability. His most ardent supporters and even many neutrals posit
that the face of Abuja as it is today can be chalked up to the courage and
determination of El-Rufai who allegedly tore down a house belonging to his
father-in-law to give way to the Abuja Master Plan. Many would also argue that Kaduna State
today is being set on a path of irreversible development. Razor-blunt and
confrontational, since he assumed the highest office in the state.
To put it
in proper perspective, the orgy of blood-letting which has enveloped Kaduna State
for years now did not start with El Rufai. Years of internecine crises between
the predominantly Christian Southern Kaduna area and the predominantly Muslim
central and northern parts of the state have reduced one of Nigeria's most
iconic states to a valley flowing with blood. When the Islamic Movement of
Nigeria blindly charged into a confrontation with men of the Nigerian Army
obviously lacking in professional restraint and were mercilessly massacred in Zaria , Kaduna
State added another
trophy to its bulging cabinet of mindless killings. A judicial commission of
Inquiry was set up by El-Rufai and though the IMN never appeared as the
condition it demanded for its appearance which was that its incarcerated
leader, Ibraheem El- Zakzaky be released was never met, the Commission duly
concluded its work within time and in its findings trenchantly indicted both
the members of the IMN and the Nigerian Army for the bloodbath.
Since then, the IMN
controversy has raged with its boiling point being Kaduna . When El Rufai introduced an executive
bill which he posited was to ‘protect Kaduna State from extremism and hate
speech,’ a cry of alarm issued from the throats of those who argued that there
was more to the bill than met the eye in a state that has historically been a
cauldron of religious tension.
It was against this
background that the recent revelation by El Rufai that he had ladled out
undisclosed sums of money to criminal herdsmen to placate them and stem their
killings has drawn more than a little flak from Nigerians. Nigeria has
officially been in recession for a while now and even those whose financial
cocoons are the hardest have found themselves pricked even if only lightly by
the austerity measures and seeming economic incompetency of a Federal
Government which is looking more directionless by the day. Nigeria`s poor, of which
ordinary families make up vast swaths have been desperately hit with many
unable to maintain supply of the basic necessities of life ad many others
losing their lives and livelihoods to the myriad negative effects of economic
difficulties. From whence then, it must be asked, did El Rufai draw his
‘ingenious’ precedent of placating killer-herdsmen with money which seems in
short supply in the Nigeria
of today?