By Ikechukwu Amaechi
It is indubitable, all pretensions to the contrary notwithstanding, that this is not the best of times for President Bola Tinubu. Granted, he is a hard guy – tough, unyielding and some will say lacking in empathy – but even the hardest of men have their vulnerable moments.
*TinubuThis must be such a moment for Tinubu because nothing can be more unsettling for a leader than when the past, thought to have been successfully buried returns like a phoenix, an apparition of sorts, with old memories and unresolved events, haunting like a sudden ghost. But make no mistake about it. Nigerians are not spared because it is a nightmare for a people to have a leader who is haunted by his dark past.
Right now
President Tinubu is engaged in a mortal combat with his own past. He is doing
everything humanly possible to ensure that whatever he did in Chicago, the
largest city in the U.S. state of Illinois more than three decades ago remains
buried in the ash heap of history – completely forgotten.
That may
well have been the case if he had remained a private citizen. But he isn’t.
Tinubu is the President of Nigeria, a country with no less than 230 million
people. And it is only normal that the citizens know everything about him
including his past. And that past includes what is already in the public
domain.
In the
early 1990s, U.S. authorities carried out investigations into alleged drug
trafficking involving Tinubu. In 1993, $460,000 was seized from an account
linked to him, a forfeiture tied to a Chicago heroin ring. Tinubu himself acknowledges
this but his supporters claim that the forfeiture was civil in nature. He was
neither charged with a criminal offense nor formally indicted, they chorus as
if that deodorises the stench which the act emits.
His
opponents demur, insisting that he was criminally charged. In 2022, an American
researcher, Aaron Greenspan, who runs the transparency platform PlainSite,
filed 12 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests with six U.S. federal
agencies seeking information relating to the Chicago heroin ring. He sought
investigative records about four named individuals allegedly associated with
the drug ring, including Tinubu, Lee Andrew Edwards, Mueez Abegboyega Akande
and Abiodun Agbele.
Five of the U.S. agencies responded, saying that
they could neither confirm nor deny the existence of the requested records.
Dissatisfied, Greenspan approached the U.S. Department of Justice’s Office of
Information Policy (OIP) for help, but to no avail.
On June 12, 2023, Greenspan filed a lawsuit at a
U.S. Court for the District of Columbia presided over by Judge Beryl Howell
challenging the agencies’ Glomar response to his FOIA requests. A Glomar
response is an official statement by a U.S. government agency refusing to
confirm or deny whether requested records exist. Though the Federal Bureau of
Investigations (FBI), Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), Internal Revenue
Service (IRS), the Executive Office for United States Attorneys (EOUSA), and
Department of State were initially named as defendants, the CIA was also later
named as a defendant.
In April 2025, Judge Howell, convinced that the
Glomar responses issued by the FBI and DEA were “improper and must be lifted”
ruled that the two agencies failed to provide information to “establish that
cognisable privacy interest exists in keeping secret the fact that Tinubu was a
subject of criminal investigation.” She further held that the two agencies
failed to provide evidence demonstrating the burden of sustaining their Glomar
responses.
But for Tinubu, the information that Greenspan was
seeking to make public is a matter of life and death. It is too sordid to be
made a menu on the breakfast table of fellow citizens. He promptly asked the
U.S. court to block the release of the records held by the Department of
Justice (DOJ), FBI and DEA.
In the 16-page court filing, his lawyers,
Christopher W. Carmichael, Victor P. Henderson and Oluwole O. Afolabi, argued
that releasing the records could infringe on Tinubu’s privacy rights.
“Regardless of the prior disclosure in the forfeiture proceeding, Intervenor
retains a privacy interest in potential disclosure of the investigative files
sought by Plaintiff,” the lawyers argued in court.
But the judge, unimpressed, ordered that the files
be released and gave a deadline. Both the U.S. DOJ and Tinubu’s legal team
requested a 10-day extension to respond. Judge Howell granted only four days,
until August 21. On August 20, the FBI filed a motion seeking to submit an ex
parte in camera declaration – a written statement submitted solely to a judge
by a party in a legal case – on why it withheld information on its
investigative records relating to Tinubu’s alleged drug trafficking scandal, an
application which was subsequently published in the social media by Von
Batten-Montague-York, a Washington-based lobbying firm recently hired by Alhaji
Atiku Abubakar, presidential candidate of the African Democratic Congress (ADC).
The FBI
claimed that Greenspan’s request seeking “the entire FBI file for Bola Ahmed
Tinubu, DOB 3/29/1952, President-Elect of Nigeria as of February 2023” and “FBI
302 interviews with Bola Tinubu from FBI Case No. 245-IP-71386-UUUUUU during
the timeframe 1992-1993” if acceded to “would, among other things, disclose
techniques and procedures for law enforcement investigations and/or could
reasonably be expected to endanger the life or physical safety of any
individual.”
Judge
Howell granted the FBI request and the agency has handed in a 399-page
unredacted file for her eyes only. It is left for her to make an informed
decision after perusing the documents but it is very unlikely that she will
overrule the FBI because the U.S. national interest is now at play. So,
Nigerians may never get to know the past that Tinubu is too ashamed of.
However, the truth has emerged.
Tinubu, contrary to what he claims, was
criminally investigated and possibly indicted on the matter. And while
Nigerians may never have access to the 399-page file, the American
establishment does and they know that something in there frightens the hell out
of the president of Africa’s most populous country, and he would do anything to
keep it out of public space. They are demons from his past.
Obviously,
President Tinubu is haunted by the demons from his past. Some Nigerians have
rallied to his support with the argument that everyone has a past. To such
people, what is important now is his ability to deliver on his extant job. But
that is where the problem lies. What is contained in those files will play a
significant role in determining how well Tinubu governs Nigeria.
How do I
mean? FBI, the U.S. principal domestic law enforcement and internal security
agency, which is fighting hard to ensure that the contents of those files are
not made public doesn’t care a hoot about Tinubu. Neither does the CIA. What is
important is the U.S. national interest. And what could that be? Tinubu, the
president of a country awash with critical mineral resources that the U.S. is
not only in dire need of but has actually gone to war in quest of, is asking
for their favour, which they are in a position to grant in exchange for
something.
So, what is
the possible quid pro quo? What is Tinubu prepared to give the Americans to
ensure that the contents of the 399-page document remain secret? Nigeria’s
sovereignty, no doubt! By agreeing to stymie the exposure of Tinubu’s dark
past, the U.S. has put him on a leash. Tinubu has become vulnerable and prone
to vile manipulations by a super power with an unscrupulous president. That is
the easiest route for a president to become a CIA asset, a useful idiot.
Contrary to
what some Nigerians had hoped for, President Donald Trump, America’s most
transactional president ever, may even help Tinubu to secure a second term.
With compromised national sovereignty, Nigerians will not stand a chance
because the worst thing that can happen to a people is to be in the
debilitating bind that Nigeria finds itself today where a president’s dark past
is imperilling the country’s future.
*Amaechi is the publisher of TheNiche (ikechukwuamaechi@yahoo.com)

No comments:
Post a Comment