By Olasunkanmi Arowolo
Education policy often involves striking a delicate balance between cultural traditions, financial realities, and long-term learning outcomes. Two recent interventions in Nigeria highlight this challenge: the Imo State government’s ban on nursery and JSS3 graduation ceremonies, and the Federal Government’s new literacy drive with cash transfers to mothers. Both have generated strong reactions, but each offers lessons worth deeper reflection.
The
graduation ban: Beyond social fanfare
I recalled I was on a short weekend visit to a family where one of the persons
in the gathering showed me a viral video of glamorous graduation ceremonies by
nursery pupils; so, even featuring red carpets, grand arrivals like prom events
in the western part of the world, asking what my thoughts were about it. I
simply said: “this is an indicator of misplaced priorities.”
A
couple of weeks later, the Imo State Commissioner for Education announced that
only Primary 6 and SS3 pupils should hold graduation ceremonies, describing
nursery and JSS3 events as unnecessary burdens on families. In my view, this is
a right hit. The National Orientation Agency also welcomed the move as “bold
and timely,” given the financial strain many parents face.
The
concern is justified. A 2023 SBM Intelligence household survey ranked
school-related social events among the top five “hidden costs” of education in
Nigeria. UNICEF reports that 63 per cent of Nigerians live below the poverty
line, defined as living on less than $1.90 per day. This high rate of poverty
highlights how elaborate graduation ceremonies can deepen inequality. Parents
who cannot afford the required costumes, parties, and levies often feel
excluded, and children may suffer the embarrassment of missing out. To address
this issue, schools should consider reducing the costs associated with these
events or offering financial assistance to ensure all students can participate
fully. Ultimately, such practices risk reinforcing social divides within the
education system and undermining efforts to promote equal opportunity for all
students.
Yet,
ceremonies are not without value. Studies by the Brookings
Institution suggest that recognising milestones, no matter how modest,
boosts children’s motivation and sense of achievement. See the Million
learning: scaling up quality education in Developing Countries report.
Therefore, a blanket ban risks throwing away the positive psychological impact
along with the excess.
A more balanced approach would be to
reimagine graduation ceremonies rather than abolish them outright. Schools
could host low-cost alternatives, such as classroom certificate presentations,
talent shows, or academic exhibitions. Such events maintain the sense of
accomplishment while reducing pressure on families. Parent-Teacher Associations
(PTAs) should be central to this redesign, ensuring that cultural traditions of
recognition are preserved without commercial excess.
In
short, the policy addresses a genuine problem, but the solution lies in
moderation, not elimination.
Tackling
out-of-school children: Promise and pitfalls
At the federal level, the government has announced a literacy initiative
targeting 500,000 children and 1 million girls, accompanied by cash transfers
to mothers. This initiative aims to reduce Nigeria’s out-of-school population,
estimated by UNESCO to be 20.2 million, the highest in the world.
International evidence shows this approach has merit. Brazil’s Bolsa FamÃlia programme and Bangladesh’s female stipend scheme both demonstrated that conditional cash transfers can boost school attendance and delay child marriage. In Nigeria, where UNICEF data shows girls in northern states are twice as likely to be out of school as boys, directing financial support to mothers could shift household priorities in favour of education.
But history offers caution. Nigeria’s previous cash transfer programmes have
struggled with leakages, poor targeting, and weak monitoring. For instance, the
National Social Investment Programme (NSIP) under the Buhari administration was
repeatedly criticised for inconsistent beneficiary data and alleged diversion
of funds. A recent study also confirmed these challenges,
highlighting systemic weaknesses that undermined the effectiveness of past
interventions.
Unless
funds are digitally tracked, transparently disbursed, and independently
audited, the initiative risks repeating old failures. Equally important,
literacy classes must not become poorly staffed “holding centres.” They should
be properly resourced as stepping stones into mainstream schooling.
Constructively, three steps could
strengthen the programme: (1) Transparency: Use digital payment systems
with biometric verification to minimise diversion; (2) Community Anchoring:
Engage PTAs, women’s groups, and local leaders in identifying beneficiaries to
enhance trust; and (3) Quality First: Pair financial incentives with
investment in teacher training and curriculum design, ensuring children gain
real skills.
With
the ever-growing social media distraction in a fast-paced world, Gen Z and Gen
A (Alpha) are experiencing a sharp decline in reading culture. Nigeria could
also learn from Kenya’s Tusome programme, which raised literacy rates by
combining structured teacher support with regular monitoring. Cash transfers
can reduce barriers, but only quality teaching transforms lives.
A call for
balanced reforms
The Imo graduation ban, and the Federal Government’s cash transfer scheme
highlight a common truth: reforms succeed not by bold headlines but by careful
implementation.
Ceremonies
should not impoverish families, but neither should they be discarded entirely.
Literacy drives should not only put children in classrooms but also equip them
with durable skills for lifelong learning. The involvement of parents,
teachers, and communities is critical to ensuring these policies become
sustainable solutions rather than short-lived experiments.
Ultimately,
Nigeria does not need fewer ceremonies or more cash handouts in isolation. What
it needs is a culture where learning itself, rather than expenditure, is the
true cause for celebration.
*Arowolo,
PhD (Journalism, University of Kent), is a commentator on public issues (oa@olaarowolo.com)
No comments:
Post a Comment