By Ikechukwu Amaechi
Let me be clear from the onset. I am neither a fan of Senator Rochas Okorocha, former governor of Imo, nor his son-in-law, Uche Nwosu, who he wanted to impose on the state as his successor. Okorocha knows that for a fact because I told him to his face in Owerri that he was a big disappointment to Ndi-Imo who preferred him to his predecessor, Ikedi Ohakim, in 2011.
Uzodinma and Okorocha
I told Okorocha that if he didn’t mend his ways and provide the people the quality governance he promised while he was out on the hustings, history will be unkind to him. Of course, he ignored my unsolicited advice and doubled down on the shenanigans that became the hallmark of his administration. He capped the political tomfoolery with the attempted imposition of Nwosu. Uche Nwosu’s political ascendancy was tied to his filial relationship with Okorocha, whose first daughter, Uloma, he wedded on January 5, 2013 while he was serving as the commissioner for lands and survey.
After the marriage, he became
the de facto deputy governor of Imo and heir apparent to the phantom “Okorocha
political dynasty”. Okorocha’s greatest undoing is his insatiable greed for
property and power and Nwosu was at the centre of that covetousness. As
commissioner for lands and survey, he facilitated his father-in-law’s
unconscionable appropriation of the people’s patrimony.
Okorocha’s attempt to impose him willy-nilly on the state was,
therefore, not only an attempt to compensate him for a job well done, but also
have a third term by proxy. It will all be in the family. Ndi-Imo were insulted
by such impudence and rejected him at the polls.
So, Ndi-Imo, who are still aggrieved, will not lose any sleep
over any legitimate step taken to ensure that Okorocha accounts for his
misdeeds in office. But at the same time, they will not allow Governor Hope Uzodimma
to use the anti-corruption facade to feather his own dubious political nest.
So, while Ndi-Imo insist that Okorocha must account for his stewardship, there
is also a near consensus of opinion that the abduction of his son-in-law from
St Peter’s Anglican Church, Eziama-Obaire, Nkwerre, on Sunday is beyond the
pale.
Nwosu went with his family for a thanksgiving service after
successfully burying his mother, Madam Jemaimah Adaeze Nwosu; and while there,
masked security operatives stormed the church, shooting sporadically into the
air. While some remained outside, about 18 of them scaled the windows and
jumped into the church, stopping the pastor who was delivering the sermon in
his tracks. Then the search for their quarry – Uche Nwosu – ensued.
When they saw where he was seated, they ordered him, in the
parlance of Nigerian security operatives, to move or be moved. Like a lamb
being led to the slaughter, he stood up and followed them. There was bedlam.
Congregants ran helter-skelter. The pastor ran for dear life. His colleagues
jumped out of the window. Outside, Nwosu was bundled into one of the vehicles
and ordered to lie down. One of the security operatives placed his leg on his
head, and they sped off.
The circumstances of the arrest led to the conclusion that he
had been abducted by the infamous “unknown gunmen”. When the video of the
“kidnap” went viral, the police was forced to issue a statement admitting that
their personnel carried out the gestapo-style arrest without giving any reason
for their action. As Nwosu himself has disclosed, he was striped half-naked in
the vehicle, handcuffed, photographed and videoed and driven to Akanu Ibiam
International Airport, Enugu, from where he was flown to Abuja.
As I write, the police are yet to disclose what crime he
committed. But the victim said he was accused of supplying arms to militants
and sponsoring insecurity in Imo. Perhaps, appreciating how frivolous the
allegation was, the Inspector-General of Police, Alkali Usman, ordered his
release same day. It is a miracle that no life was lost in the melee. Many had
asked what the madness was all about. Even if Uche Nwosu is confirmed to be a
terrorist in the class of Osama bin-Laden, is there no other better way of
arresting him without endangering the lives of many?
He was not on the run. Why didn’t the security operatives pick
him up at the airports? What about his house in Abuja, Owerri or even his
village in Nkwerre? A man who buried his mother barely a week ago cannot be
said to be in hiding. Nwosu said he was never invited by the police at any time
and challenged anyone with a contrary evidence to prove him wrong. The police
have kept mum. What manner of police force would carry out such a dastardly
raid without any overriding reason? In any case, if he was going to be set free
unconditionally same day, as indeed he was, why the bother? Truth be told, the
gestapo-style abduction of Nwosu detracts from the professionalism of the
Nigeria police. It ridicules the Force. But most importantly, who wrote the petition
and what end is the petition meant to serve?
Even before the dust settled, all fingers were already pointing
in the direction of Hope Uzodimma. Okorocha pointedly accused him of framing up
his son-in-law and misinforming the IGP to arrest him. Expectedly, the state
government fired back, accusing Okorocha of panicking and speaking
incoherently. But that is hogwash. If any party spoke incoherently in the
aftermath of this tragi-comedy, it is the Uzodimma camp.
The commissioner for information and strategy, Declan Emelumba,
said Okorocha should wait for the outcome of the arrest.
“Okorocha is in panic and is trying to whip up sentiment. A man
who looted the state dry, he should wait for due process to take place since he
now knows it is the security agencies that arrested Nwosu,” Emelumba said.
Well, that arrest, with the unconditional release of the victim, is becoming
like a storm in a teacup. It is a farce and the joke, sooner than later, will
be on Uzodimma, rather than Nwosu.
And talking about incoherence, what could be more incoherent
than the allusion to “a man who looted the state dry?” Was Uche Nwosu arrested
because Okorocha looted Imo dry or because he is allegedly sponsoring terrorism
in Imo? Rather than Okorocha, it is Uzodimma who is trying to whip up sentiment
by throwing the bogeyman of corruption into the combustible mix. He knows too
well that reminding Ndi-Imo that Okorocha looted their patrimony would dry up
the well of sympathy for any member of his family. And since last Sunday, I have
heard some people ask: Who cares what happens to Okorocha and his clan? Ndi-Imo
should care.
Why? Because, the abduction of Nwosu was not in furtherance of
any so-called war against corruption by the Uzodimma administration. It is part
of the cynical plot by the administration to frame anyone perceived to be in
opposition to its ultimate game plan. Many Imo youths have paid the supreme
price. It is unacceptable that Imo State, the Igbo heartland, hitherto a land
of peace and harmony has become a theatre of war and gory bloodletting.
Ndi-Imo will like to know who actually is responsible for the
mayhem in their beloved state. But Governor Uzodimma should take a peep at
himself in the mirror. I doubt, if he is sincere, that he will like the image
that will stare back at him. Rather than playing the ostrich, Uzodimma should
ask himself the hard questions. The Bible says: “When the righteous are in
authority, the people rejoice: but when the wicked beareth rule, the people
mourn”(Proverbs 29:2).
Since Uzodimma was imposed on the state by the Supreme Court,
peace has become an illusion. Imo now typifies the Hobbesian state of nature
where human life is “solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short”. Uche Nwosu is
alive today probably because he is a politically-exposed person who is highly
connected. Hundreds of Imo youths have been wasted after being framed up as
terrorists because they have nobody to speak for them.
In delivering a dissenting ruling when the Supreme Court
dismissed the application for review of its January 14, 2020 judgement which
removed Emeka Ihedioha as Imo State governor, and declared Uzodinma as the
valid winner of the election, Justice Centus Nweze said the decision “will
continue to haunt our (Nigeria’s) electoral jurisprudence for a long time to
come”. He was right. But beyond the country’s electoral jurisprudence, that
decision has haunted Imo State to perdition. In two years of Uzodimma’s
governorship, Imo State has gone to the dogs.
*Ikechukwu Amaechi is the publisher of TheNiche
No comments:
Post a Comment