By Ugochukwu Ejinkeonye
The best value sincere friends and associates of the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF), Mr. Abubakar Malami, can inject in his career now would be to ensure that he schools himself to always speak sparingly and recognise the need to regularly deploy more time and effort to benefit from informed legal inputs before responding to very serious issues. The office he occupies is such an important and strategic one whose submissions on legal controversies Nigerians can confidently rely upon. It is always very disheartening whenever his interventions on very weighty national affairs are easily faulted by Nigerians, including even street traders and roadside mechanics.
When the 17 Southern
governors met in Asaba on May 11, 2021, and announced a ban on
open grazing behind which gun-wielding Fulani herdsmen had for several years
now hidden to commit various atrocities like brutal rapes of women and
daughters, wanton destructions of crops, maiming or killing of farmers and the
invasion and razing of communities, AGF Malami had rushed out to describe the
governors’ resolution as “unconstitutional” and “dangerous.”
On Channels TV, Malami
pronounced: “It is about constitutionality within the context of the freedoms
expressed in our constitution…For example, it is as good as saying, perhaps,
maybe, the northern governors coming together to say they prohibit spare parts
trading in the north.”
The magisterial carriage with which this obviously very pedestrian and preposterous intervention was delivered must have deepened the astonishment of many Nigerians. How can a “learned gentleman” (least of all the AGF) compare violent herdsmen who appear to derive hideous animation from wantonly destroying farmlands and visiting their owners with diverse destructions and violations to motor spare parts traders who peacefully hire shops from their owners, pay taxes to government and undertake their business in ways that do not inflict any harm on anyone?
It was such a horrendous faux pas from which
Nigerians of diverse social and educational rankings quickly formulated a
cocktail of jokes and hashtags to entertain and relieve themselves of the
tension and stress lavishly donated to them by the severe hardship and
crippling insecurity choking the country.
Ondo State Governor, Mr. Rotimi Akeredolu,
himself a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), could not hide his embarrassment:
“It is most unfortunate
that the AGF is unable to distill issues as expected of a Senior Advocate.
Nothing can be more disconcerting. This outburst should, ordinarily, not
elicit response from reasonable people who know the distinction between a
legitimate business that is not in any way injurious and a certain predilection
for anarchy,” Akeredolu lamented in a statement he personally signed.
If Malami had reaped any
useful lessons from Akeredolu’s rebuke, he has proved quite incapable of
ensuring their proper utilisation. His shoddy handling of the
“interception” and “re-arrest” of Mr. Nnamdi Kanu, the leader of the Indigenous
Peoples of Biafra (IPOB) has further compounded the country’s image crisis and
diminishment. At the press conference he addressed about forty-eight hours
after Kanu was bundled back to the country, the AGF was unable to
see the need to explain to Nigerians the legal and diplomatic processes
followed by the government to bring back the IPOB leader. Nigerians were then
left to feast on the speculations and rumours the pathetic absence of proper
explanation had engendered.
Matters were made worse
with the swift denial of the Kenyan Government of any form of involvement in
Kanu’s “re-arrest.”
At a press conference in
Abuja, the Kenya High Commissioner to Nigeria, Dr. Wilfred Machage,
fumed: “I want to address this allegation by denying that Kenya was
involved in the alleged arrest in Kenya and extradition to Nigeria of Mr. Kanu.
To us therefore, these allegations are fictional, imaginary and deliberately
concocted to fuel antagonistic feelings among certain section of the Nigerian
people. We are also disturbed, dismayed and astonished by the unfortunate
statement on the alleged arrest in Kenya which was carried in the dailies. The
government of Kenya is particularly appalled by the spurious, derogatory and
libelous mention of the name of our dear President on this matter.”
Sadly, AGF Malami did not
appear to have appreciated the damage Kenya’s rebuttal had wreaked on the image
of his office and that of Nigeria. Following this was the revelation by Kanu’s
lawyer, Ifeanyi Ejiofor, that Kanu had confirmed to his legal team that he “was
tortured, maltreated and mercilessly beaten” in Kenya.
Ejiofor said on Arise
TV: “After spending eight days in their illegal custody,” the Kenyans
“now beckoned to the Nigerian government. Kanu was lifeless and unconscious by
the time they were bringing him to Nigeria.”
Now despite this astounding claim by the Kanu camp and denial of any involvement by the Kenyan Government, it is demoralising that till now, only Malami and, perhaps, the few people that collaborated in this odious and internationally embarrassing enterprise can give a coherent narration of the exact legal and diplomatic process (if any) followed by Nigeria to bring Kanu back, since, the AGF has not told us that the IPOB leader was arrested in Nigeria.
If indeed Kanu was arrested in Kenya and the Kenyan Government is
furiously denying any form of collaboration with Nigeria in the so called
“extradition,” does it mean then that Nigerian security officials had sneaked
into Kenya and collaborated with some criminal elements in the country to kidnap
Kanu and bundle him back to Nigeria? What exactly happened? Why is
it taking the AGF’s office too long to recognise the importance of being very
transparent about this matter?
This would readily
remind Nigerians of the case of late Umar Dikko during the military
dictatorship of this same General Muhammadu Buhari in 1984 who was allegedly
kidnapped in the United Kingdom and crated as a “diplomatic
baggage.” The attempt to bring Dikko to Nigeria in a crate was,
however, foiled by the British security agencies. Although Nigeria and their
alleged Israeli collaborators never admitted to any involvement, the incident
badly affected diplomatic relations between Nigeria and Britain at that time
and the people who transported Dikko to the airport were jailed in the UK.
No doubt, this matter is now beyond Nnamdi Kanu. No matter the nature of the offense any Nigerian had committed and the need to bring him to justice, should that justify the deployment of crude, illegal methods and the breaching of international laws to do that? Such actions can only further diminish and de-market the country before the civilised world and attract unsavoury consequences.
Now, is this the kind of accomplishment an attorney-general and
Senior Advocate ought to be seen unabashedly celebrating? By the time Kanu’s
lawyers fulfill their promise to drag Nigeria and Kenya to the International
Criminal Court (ICC) over the matter, what picture will Nigeria assume before
the rest of the world? Already the British press is feasting on the story and
painting very ugly pictures about Nigeria due to this incident.
So disgusted with the
whole process, and in absence of any coherent explanation by the AGF, a
Nigerian serving as the Minister of Justice and Solicitor-General of Alberta,
Canada, Mr. Kelechi Madu, had to declare that if indeed it was true that Kanu
was “abducted in Kenya with the active collaboration of the Kenyan government
led by President Uhuru Kenyatta,” then “Nigeria and Kenya
violated international law and the rule of law that is supreme in their
respective countries.” He went on to underline his doubts about the
qualification of Malami for the post of AGF.
Responding to Mr.
Madu’s assertions, Malami pronounced: “It is important to educate the likes of Kelechi Madu that both
Nigeria (his country of birth) and Canada (where he claims to be practising
law) are signatories to the Multinational Treaty Agreement where, among others,
fugitive fleeing justice in nations with the similar agreement could be brought
back to face justice.”
Now, I do not wish to bother myself with the
insults that crept into the exchange, but the AGF must be willing to admit that
he has not helped Nigeria’s image by failing to explain a very significant
point, namely, whether the
“Multinational Treaty Agreement” he cited authorises a country to sneak into
any other country and abduct an alleged “fugitive fleeing justice”?
Are there no legal and diplomatic processes
that are usually followed for the extradition of accused people and why should
the Nigerian people not be fully briefed on that? Is Malami not embarrassed
that Kenya has quickly distanced herself from the obvious legal and diplomatic
mess she and Nigeria had, probably, created? Or was Kanu arrested in nameless
country?
One
would have expected that before raining abuses on Madu, Malami should have
first clearly explained the processes Nigeria had deployed to undertake the
extradition so that Madu would see how wrong he was in attacking Malami? How
does telling us that Madu is only an attorney-general of a province in Canada
help our quest for correct and detailed information? And how exactly did the
extract exuberantly quoted by the AGF from the Canadian laws explain this
“interception” and “extradition” mess his office appears to have plunged
Nigeria into?
Well,
Malami should hasten to benefit himself with the information that Alberta, a
province of about 680,000 square kilometers of land has about 387 billion
dollars GDP. Reports say that “Alberta's
per capita of $78,155 is the highest of any state or province in North
America” How does this
make Malami’s debt-ridden country, with per capita of US$2, 083 (for 2020) and
choking with excruciating hardship and boundless insecurity better than the
Canadian province he is trying to despise? Should any person who values his
self-respect even be proud to introduce himself as part of the current regime
in Nigeria under which life has been unspeakably devalued?
*Ejinkeonye,
a Nigerian journalist and writer, is the author of the book, Nigeria:
Why Looting May Not Stop (scruples2006@yahoo.com)
*Culled from Daily
Independent newspaper of August 17,
2021
No comments:
Post a Comment