Merit, taken
objectively, is ‘something earned, something owed to a person. Taken
subjectively, merit is the right of a person to his earning and is of two
types- condign and congruous merits. While condign merit deals with strict
justice to a reward, congruous merit is not so much a right as a claim but
rests upon what is suitable or fitting in a situation’.
With this words of
Paul Glenn in mind, each time I am asked my opinion on the nation’s media
industry in relation to free speech/freedom of expression, I usually pause to
honestly look at its virtues and attributes both objectively and subjectively,
and in all, one thing often stands out; the Nigerian media industry in the
writer’s views neither merits nor deserves the inequitable treatments so far
mated to it by the successive administrations. The reason for this position is signposted in the fact that the vast majority of the ordinances/codes made to guide the practice has never squared up or in harmony with the moral laws. A case that has postured the right to freedom of speech as enshrined in the nation’s 1999 constitution as amended to a mere declaration of intent rather than that of reality.
Standing as telling
examples are; the infamous decree 4 of 1984 and very recently, the
controversial Nigerian Press Council Bill 2018 currently before the
national Assembly-the senate; a bill that its emergence has further blown hot
wind into the media industry and caused the practitioners to stagger in
confusion and incomprehension. Certainly, citizens of every nation whether
democratic or otherwise hunger for ‘public forum or sphere where the issues of
the public interests are viewed as central, and openly considered, discussed or
debated. On their part, the politicians and public office holders also have a
great interest in how the media covers their behavior. They depend on the media
to provide the information they need about the people and the society. The
media practitioners, in turn, depend much on the authorities (public office
holders) for their information. Increasingly, by choice or by accident, a
number of issues daily emanate from this mutual dependency as the vast majority
of public office holders are allergic to accepting their political past/mistakes
while others are not disposed to having their political future discussed.
Consequently, the
nation has on countless occasions witnessed this relationship snowball into a
frosty one as the government attempts to unjustly moderate, control or regulate
public discourse using decrees (during the military eras) and draconian
legislation to impose punishments are incongruence with logic or reason. Fresh
in our memories were the excruciating ordeal of two journalists with The
Guardian Newspapers -Nduka Irabor and Tunde Thompson jailed by a military
tribunal on the 4th of July,1984 for reports that were not lacking in
merit but asymmetrically viewed to have contravened the same infamous
decree 4.
Similarly, the recent
Oyo state Government/Fresh FM saga has become to media owners/ practitioners a
rocky episode of frustration and bewilderment. Very instructive, I have no
despair about the future of media practice and freedom of expression in Nigeria
but the events of the past weeks has become an emblematic proof that the soul
of decree 4 still pervades our national media wavelength and further revealed
an unhappy truth that free speech is under attack- a state of affairs
considered bad for morals. However, just before you shed your doubt on this position;
wait till you cast a glance at the synoptic litany of the recent attempts to
cage the media.
First and most radical
was the present administration’s unfortunate attempt to regulate the activities
of Non-Governmental Organizations (NGO) in the country, which was followed in
quick succession by another ill-fated attempt to censor the social media, with
the ceaseless efforts by the government culminating in the proposition of hate
speech bill. Strangely but anticipated, before the dust raised by the proposed
hate speech bill could settle down, that of the Nigerian Press Council
Bill 2018 was up- a bill greeted with knocks and viewed by industry watchers as
draconian and another attempts to take the media industry back to the dark
days. This situation is even made worse by the sudden acrimony between the
Nigerian Broadcasting Corporation and some radio and television stations
over their purported inability to settle sundry debts/charges to the
commission; a claim which most of the embattled stations have denied. Indeed,
as someone that is sufficiently interested in seeing Nigeria turn to a zone of
peace, it will in the first instance be rewarding if the pro- Nigerian Press
Council Bill 2018 proves to the stakeholders the defects the bill is set out to
correct and must be in total compliance with the provisions
of section 22 of the nation’s constitution which states thus;
“The press, radio, television and other agencies of the mass media shall at all
times be free to uphold the fundamental objectives contained in this chapter
and uphold the responsibility and accountability of the government to the
people.” Accordingly, if the bill is passed into, from what Nigerians with
critical interests are saying, the fundamental rights to freedom of expression,
to which all Nigerians are entitled under section 39 of the constitution, will
only exist in the frames without a free press. However, whatever the true
position may be, it’s crucial for all to note that media organizations
must not undermine but support the fundamental needs of the country, and, the
positive purpose of the elected government if it will not in any way
dent/obstruct the media’s primary responsibility to the masses in a democratic
society which among others includes -inculcating and reinforcing positive
political, cultural, social attitudes among the citizenries.
Create a mood in which
people become keen to acquire skills and disciplines of developed
nations.Again, as this brouhaha between the media organizations/practitioners’
and the government institutions continues unabated, our leaders should
realize that with the advent of the social media, which has given birth to
‘citizen’s journalism, media practice the world over has broken loose from the
paralysis of conformity and transcended to a democratized
information management age. Aside from the above, another silent point we must
not fail to remember as good governance proponents is that ‘where the media is
free, the marketplace of ideas sort the irresponsible from the responsible. But
a partisan press helps the politicians to flood the marketplace of ideas with
junks and confuse and befuddle the people so that they could not see what their
vital interest could mean. In view of the above, free press the world over has
become an organic necessity in the society that provides a platform/avenue for
positive criticism, reliable, and intelligent reporting through which the
government can be informed about what the people of the country are thinking
and doing.
Finally, ‘whenever the
people are well informed, they can be trusted with their own government, as a
well-informed citizenry could govern itself and secure liberty for
individuals’. Likewise, it is important to state here that for us to achieve
the promised hypermodern Nation, freedom of speech/expression and a
democratized media are not just enviable but eminently desirable.
*Utomi, a Journalist and Researcher
*Utomi, a Journalist and Researcher
No comments:
Post a Comment