By Ifeanyi Afuba
A new Anambra
State is in the making.
It is an evolving society in which the government-citizen pact is growing
roots. The cultivation of this social progressive force reached a new height
with the resolution of the November 18, 2017 governorship poll. Some say the
journey started with the revolt of the Chris Ngige regime shortly after it came
to office in 2003. I disagree.
*Gov Willie Obiano |
Yes, there was an
attempt at a new consciousness but it was circumstantial, narrow in objective
and largely driven by sentiment. The radical shift came with the reclamation of
Peter Obi’s stolen 2003 governorship mandate. That democratic empowerment ushered
in the season of citizen-centred governance. But, after eight years of this
wind of change, the road of renewal ran into fresh challenges from both
predictable and unexpected quarters. Governor Willie Obiano’s programme of
consolidation and expansion soon met with opposition from not just the old
order, but foundation members of the movement. Consequently, the November 18,
2017 poll effectively became the plebiscite on which road to travel.
But, Willie Obiano had so distinguished himself in piloting
the affairs of the state that his candidacy became synonymous with stability, a
strong economy and improved social services. The state’s economy was rebounding
with huge investment inflow and increasing job opportunities.
A remarkable road maintenance service was in swing, shoring
up the functionality of ageing and poorly constructed roads in past
dispensations but perhaps more significantly, instilling in the public
consciousness the value of maintenance culture. In less than two years, the
profile of Awka, the capital city, had changed from spatial anonymity to a
landscape of landmarks.
Social welfare schemes ranging from subsidized mass
transportation, suspension of school and market levies, to pay rise for workers
gave a human face to governance. Under Obiano, the people acquired a sense of
security, not just from the significant reduction in crime rate but from
responsive leadership. Many still marvel at the seeming ease with which Obiano
achieved the relocation of Boko Haram suspects from Ekwulobia Prison under
trying political circumstances. Today, suspects in the Ozubulu killings are on
trial as promised. This leadership delivery inevitably translated into APGA’s
fortunes.
APGA, it is to be remembered, has been in government in Anambra State in the past twelve years. And,
even the most uncharitable critic concedes that in that short stretch of Nigeria ’s
political economy, Anambra transited from the fringes of a failing State to the
frontline of development. This phenomenal leap did not occur in a vacuum and
continues to be forged in the framework of the APGA model. As a movement, APGA
is concerned about giving a voice to the voiceless; revisiting the plight of
the marginalised; and charting an inclusive process for creating a stable
political union in the country. Given this progressive agenda, it is easy to
see how the APGA mission of social reconstruction cannot be divorced from
economic empowerment.
However, in the true dynamism of people and society, the old
order that held down the state with transactional politics in the past had not
actually given up. Though ousted from government, it was able to still retain
vestiges of power because of the quasi unitary structure of the Nigerian state
– a system that potentially makes the 36 small states of the federation
vulnerable to the exercise of federal authority. In the past one and a half
decades, this neo-oligarchic club was beaten but not bowed; and bidding it’s
time to stage a comeback to governmental influence. And, an opening occurred in
the primaries of the APC where a well known political contractor backed Tony
Nwoye to clinch the ticket of the party. The sponsor had an unflattering
history of meddling in governments, especially during military rule; and the
people still recall with regret that this era was the most wasteful years of
government in the State. Adding the brash youthfulness and inexperience of the
candidate to the bargain was a burden Ndi Anambra were not prepared to accept.
The breakaway fraction of APGA that eventually produced the
candidate of the PDP presented no better alternative. With a great record as
former Governor of Anambra State and pathfinder in Anambra’s democratic
struggle, Mr Peter Obi stood a good chance of offering a new direction in
Anambra’s journey. But he had soon set many minds wondering with the media
attacks against Governor Obiano which the people could not justify in the face
of the evidence before them.
The doubts graduated into disapproval with Obi’s indiscreet
personalisation of the state’s politics. The notion of I enthroned, I am
dethroning and will re-enthrone was a sharp statement which Ndi Anambra in all
their fickle mindedness could not ignore. A suggestion of return to any form of
behind-the-scene-Governor in the running of the State was disappointing. It was
particularly disappointing coming from those perceived as heroes of the State’s
democratic struggle. It was an objectionable scheme, an overreach doomed to
failure in the face of the Obiano trends.
On a much lesser scale, the zoning factor came into play in
the November 2017 election. In spite of earlier pronouncements by the party
leaders that no zoning policy was in force, as apparently indicated in the
inclusion of aspirants from other zones in their primaries, the APC and PDP
each came up with candidates who hailed from the north senatorial zone as
Obiano! An interesting coincidence! For the APC as for the PDP, the nomination was a crunch
exercise to slice out a piece of the zoning meat. But the zoning bit only made
sense in terms of Obiano’s continuation. In the gentleman zoning ‘agreement’,
the Governorship was to rotate among senatorial districts every eight years. It
was, therefore, easy to see the deception in the candidates pledging to do
single tenure of four years! And, credit goes to Mr Peter Obi for proposing the
APGA zoning policy in 2009 when he sought a second term ticket. The underlying
principle was that four years was not enough to achieve optimal result.
In the end, the people found the canvassers for change in Anambra State overflowing with grandstanding but
lacking in the specifics. We did not hear a word on how to reduce dependence on
federal revenue allocation. There was no word on how to handle agitations for
wage increase. There was no word on the means of funding a thousand campaign
promises in the face of declining oil revenue.
APGA had lost electoral victories to the PDP’s rigging machinery
since 2003. With the PDP’s reign of impunity over, the APGA revolution looks
set to flourish.
*Afuba writes from Nimo, Anam bra State .
No comments:
Post a Comment