By Azuka Onwuka
Before August 9, 1965, the Singaporeans were seen as an
irritation in Malaysia .
Then Singapore was one of
the 14 states of Malaysia .
Singaporeans were viewed as arrogant, stubborn, and domineering. While the
United Malays National Organisation wanted affirmative action or “quota system”
for the Malays, the People's Action Party of the Singaporeans insisted that the
best thing for the country was a merit-based policy on all issues, so as to
bring out the best in the nation and create a spirit of excellence.
*Odumegwu-Ojukwu |
This constant disagreements and tensions resulted in
racial riots. It got to a point, the Malays could take it no more. So on August
9, 1965 they convened the parliament, with no Singaporean parliamentarian
present. At that sitting, the legislators voted unanimously (126 - 0) to expel Singapore from Malaysia .
When the Singaporeans heard that they had been expelled
from the nation, at first they were devastated. But they took their fate in the
hands and started building a new nation. And indeed, by applying merit and the
pursuit of excellence, Singaporeans built a country that moved from Third World
to First World in record time, overtaking Malaysia in all ramifications.
Interestingly, despite this sad way of parting, Malaysia and Singapore have remained good
neighbours. In spite of the success Singapore
has recorded, it has not made Malaysia
not to record its own success.
There are many similarities between the story of Singapore and Malaysia
and Igbo and Nigeria .
The Igbo are not happy with the quota system policy used in the admission into
federal schools and federal positions. They want competitiveness in every
sector, which will lead to the best being selected, for the sake of excellence.
The Igbo are seen as arrogant, noisy, domineering,
greedy, over-ambitious, to mention but a few. Many Nigerians see them as
irritants. They get killed frequently, especially in the North, at the least
misunderstanding. Sometimes the cause of the provocation is someone from Denmark , Cameroon
or another part of Nigeria .
There are many Nigerians who will easily tell you: “We
will never allow an Igbo person to rule Nigeria .” There are many who
believe that the problem of Nigeria
is from the Igbo, and that once the Igbo are done away with, Nigeria ’s
problems will disappear.
Given this scenario, the Igbo want a true federal system
that will make Nigeria look like what it was before 1966, with each state or
region taking charge of most of its affairs and moving at its own pace. Sadly,
anytime it mentions restructuring or true federalism, there are forces that
resist it vehemently and insist that such will not be allowed.
Ironically, despite this view by many Nigerians about
the Igbo, anytime any person or group from Igbo land asks that the Igbo be
allowed to leave Nigeria
to form their own country, the resistance from most Nigerians is fierce. This
reaction creates a contradiction. If the Igbo are irritants and troublemakers,
why not expel them from Nigeria
the way Singaporeans were expelled from Malaysia ? But if you see them as
valuable and believe they must be part of the Nigerian state, why not treat
them as equal partners in the union? What does Nigeria really want from the Igbo?
Recently news broke that the Department of State
Services embarked on a recruitment exercise, with 165 recruited from the
North-west. The report said that 51 people were recruited from Katsina State alone, the home state of President
Muhammadu Buhari and the Director General of Department of State Security, Mr
Lawal Daura, while the number of people recruited from the five states of the
South-east was 44 and the number recruited from the six states of the
South-south was 42.
Compare that with the academic performance of the
different zones of Nigeria .
The Unified Tertiary Matriculation Education of 2016 produced the following
number of applicants from the six zones:
South-east (five states) = 335,883;
South-West (six states) = 320,691;
South-south (six states) = (299,632);
North-central (six states plus the FCT) = 259,846;
North-west (seven states) = 163,240;
North-east (six states) = 96,220;
South-West (six states) = 320,691;
South-south (six states) = (299,632);
North-central (six states plus the FCT) = 259,846;
North-west (seven states) = 163,240;
North-east (six states) = 96,220;
The six states that produced the highest number of
candidates were:
1. Imo – 104,383
2. Delta – 78,854
3. Anambra – 77,694
4. Osun – 72,752
5. Oyo – 72,298
6.Enugu –
69,381
1. Imo – 104,383
2. Delta – 78,854
3. Anambra – 77,694
4. Osun – 72,752
5. Oyo – 72,298
6.
The six states that produced the least number of
candidates were:
31. Adamawa – 15,615
32. Jigawa – 12,664
33. Yobe – 10,045
34. Sokoto – 10,006
35. Kebbi – 8,947
36. Zamfara – 5,295
31. Adamawa – 15,615
32. Jigawa – 12,664
33. Yobe – 10,045
34. Sokoto – 10,006
35. Kebbi – 8,947
36. Zamfara – 5,295
The states that were given a minimum of 130 cut-off mark
out of 200 in
the 2013 examination into the Unity Schools were:
Anambra – Male (139) Female (139)
Imo – Male (138) Female (138)
Enugu – Male (134) Female (134)
Lagos – Male
(133) Female (133)
Delta – Male (131) Female (131)
Ogun – Male (131) Female (131)
Abia – Male (130) Female (130)
Imo – Male (138) Female (138)
Delta – Male (131) Female (131)
Ogun – Male (131) Female (131)
Abia – Male (130) Female (130)
For the same examination, the states that were given
cut-off marks of less than 50 were:
Borno – Male (45) Female (45)
Jigawa – Male (44) Female (44)
Bauchi – Male (35) Female (35)
Kebbi – Male (9) Female (20)
Sokoto – Male (9) Female (13)
Taraba – Male (3) Female (11)
Yobe – Male (2) Female (27)
Zamfara – Male (4) Female (2)
Jigawa – Male (44) Female (44)
Bauchi – Male (35) Female (35)
Kebbi – Male (9) Female (20)
Sokoto – Male (9) Female (13)
Taraba – Male (3) Female (11)
Yobe – Male (2) Female (27)
Zamfara – Male (4) Female (2)
The six states that scored above 50 percent in the 2015
West African Senior School Certificate of Education were:
Abia (63.94%),
Anambra (61.18%),
Edo (61.05%),
Rivers (55.69%),
and Imo (52.49%).
Anambra (61.18%),
Rivers (55.69%),
and Imo (52.49%).
The states that scored below 13 percent in the same
examination were:
Kebbi (12.08%),
Katsina (10.81%),
Gombe (7.41%),
Jigawa (6.37%),
Zamfara (6.23%),
Yobe (4.37%).
Katsina (10.81%),
Gombe (7.41%),
Jigawa (6.37%),
Zamfara (6.23%),
Yobe (4.37%).
These are verifiable results that have remained
virtually the same for decades. And they give an idea of the number of
candidates that are involved in education from each state and zone as well as
their academic performance.
The point of this essay is not that it is only the Igbo
that excel in many sectors. Other ethnic groups, especially from the South, also
excel. But the focus of this essay is the Igbo. From the attitude of other
ethnic groups, it seems that they are comfortable with the status quo. If not,
they should not be focusing on the Igbo as their problem.
The call for restructuring of the country has been
promoted as the solution to Nigeria ’s
problem. However, there are strong forces that are hell-bent on ensuring that
restructuring of the country never succeeds. They have been erroneously
schooled that restructuring will impoverish them.
The danger in this hard line against restructuring is
that if restructuring fails, the alternative may not be palatable. Nigeria has
moved in a self-destructive path for long. Nigeria has been wallowing in
retrogression for long, because some stakeholders are afraid that pulling it
out and setting it on the path of progress will cost them their feeding bottle.
But nothing lasts forever.
Two weeks ago, the leader of the Indigenous People of
Biafra, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, met his seemingly impossible bail conditions within
48 hours. When the bail conditions were made public, the belief of many was
that no serving Senator of the Federal Republic of Nigeria would want to
associate with him. But the South-east caucus of the Senate met and quickly
chose one of them to stand bail for him. All other conditions were also swiftly
met.
If those conditions were given in December 2015, no
Nigerian Senator would have wanted to be associated with Kanu. Since his coming
into office, Buhari has continued to display a type of croynism and
prebendalism that have never been witnessed in Nigeria . And the worst
beneficiaries of these are the Igbo. He has been making it clear by his words
and actions that the North and the Igbo are not equal partners in the Nigerian
project. He has been distributing Nigerian resources and appointments to his
kinsmen and region as if they are his personal property. This brazen nepotism
has made even the fiercest Igbo critics of Kanu’s call for secession to develop
sympathies for Kanu.
Nigerians must decide what they want from the Igbo. It
is either they want the Igbo in Nigeria
as full citizens or they want them out as non-citizens. As the English say,
Nigerians can’t have their cake and eat it.
*Mr. Onwuka is a commentator on public issues (azonwuka@yahoo.com)
No comments:
Post a Comment