By Moses E. Ochonu
There is a roving, seemingly ubiquitous army
of Nigerians who have appointed themselves defenders of President Buhari.
Unfortunately, by employing offensive and ineffective logics and tactics, these
fanatical supporters of the president are doing more reputational harm than
good to their hero, and turning away compatriots who would otherwise be willing
to give the president a fair hearing on the mounting disappointments with his
administration.
*Buhari |
Yesterday, I saw an update on my Facebook
timeline with the following words: “if
Jonathan had won, the dollar would be exchanging for N1000.” This was
apparently advanced to counter the criticism of the naira’s current free fall
under the confused monetary policy of this administration.
Where does one begin on this fanatically
blind, impulsive defence of Buhari? First of all, that statement begins from a
premise of absence, which is a no-no in logic. Jonathan did not win, so we do
not and cannot know what would have happened to the naira had he won. That
belongs in the realm of known unknowns, to paraphrase Donald Rumsfeld.
Historians call this counterfactual logic or
argument. And, by the way, since when did Jonathan become the baseline of
comparison for the author(s) of this Facebook update?
Second, it is a defence that slyly attempts to
divert our attention away from the current Forex reality, which is that under
Buhari the naira has lost about 40 percent of its value against the dollar in
the parallel market. We can debate the extent to which this is the fault of the
fiscal and monetary policies of the president, but that is a separate
conversation.
Third, the defence is premised on a negative —
that is, the fact that the dollar does NOT (yet) exchange for N1000, instead of
on the fact that it DOES exchange for N360, which is about N150 more than it
exchanged under Jonathan. In this warped reasoning, we should only start
complaining about Buhari’s monetary policies when the dollar begins to exchange
for more than N1000!
*Moses Ochonu |
Finally, when people resort to what could have
been: had Jonathan won and start making illogical exculpatory arguments based
on speculative counterfactuals and a denial of the present state of things,
then you know that they are only interested in one thing: protecting Buhari
against criticism.
They are not interested in the important
matter of whether things are getting better or worse in the country, whether
inflation is rising or falling. More critically, it tells you their location in
the spectrum of the Buhari-APC universe. They are clearly located in the
fanatical, irrational wing of the Buhari supporters camp.
This kind of “defence” only confirms and
validates criticisms of the government’s primitive, unrealistic, and
unsustainable monetary policies because it inadvertently accepts that things
are really bad, only suggesting that things could have been worse had Jonathan
won. It’s not a good defence.
The bag of rationales and excuses that
Buharists have been dipping into is emptying rapidly. Alibis that appeared
reasonable several months ago now sound silly, contrived, and bogus. Blaming
and scapegoating, which seemed plausible and convincing earlier, now look
hollow. Citizens who were once receptive to arguments about the many obstacles
in Buhari’s way have now been rendered skeptical by the escapist and denialist
attitude of some of Buhari’s supporters. These overzealous supporters are now
the reason why many are reluctant to extend the benefit of the doubt earlier
given to the president.
In the interest of productive public debate
and robust engagement with the president and his agenda, here is a list of how
not to defend Buhari because they have clearly become counterproductive and do
the president more harm than good.
1. Do not instinctively deny the president’s
mistakes. He is human, fallible, and thus capable of errors like all of us.
2. Do not assume that good intentions always
produce good outcomes. They say the road to hell is paved with good intentions.
Intentions are only meaningful for citizens when they are translated into
policies and actions that benefit the majority of citizens.
3. Do not defend the president by arguing a
negative — that is, that that without Buhari’s ascendancy to the presidency,
things would be a lot worse. We don’t know this for sure. Besides, it is a
terrible thing that the only positive thing you have to say about your
political hero is that he is merely a preserver of the status quo, someone who
is merely preventing the country from regressing. He came to power fancifully on
the promise of changing the country, not on that of simply keeping things from
getting worse. It is an impossible task to argue a negative. Ask Obama, who
will never get credit for saving the US economy from total collapse because we
don’t know for sure what would have happened had McCain won and we don’t know
for sure that the US economy, bad as it was, was heading for total collapse.
There is no way to say definitely what would have happened had Obama not won,
so he continues to struggle to get the credit for engineering a remarkable
recovery.
*Information Minister, Lai Mohammed |
4. Do not defend the president by repeatedly
invoking Jonathan’s record. It is getting tiresome. Besides, it contradicts the
foundation of Buhari’s political persona — that he is the ultimate
anti-Jonathan. If we take him at his word, it would be insulting to compare him
at every turn to Jonathan, and to celebrate him merely because “Jonathan did or would do worse.”
5. Do not question the patriotism of those who
criticise Buhari. You are not more patriotic than them. Supporting Buhari is
not the same as supporting Nigeria ,
and vice versa.
6. As a Buhari supporter, do not begin every
attempt to complain about Buhari’s administration or to criticise his action or
inaction by prefacing such a critique with hackneyed and increasingly boring
attacks on Jonathanians or those who voted for Jonathan. That they voted for
Jonathan does not take away their stakes in the nation, nor does it abrogate
their right to hold the president of their country accountable. It is their duty
to criticise their president, whether they are doing so sincerely or
mischievously. Even if they opposed Buhari’s candidacy, they may have
transitioned to responsible, critical citizens under his presidency. He is
after all their president too. It is okay that you voted for Buhari and you now
have reasons to criticise his actions. That is courage. That is patriotism,
which transcends individual leaders. This disposition legitimises you and lends
credibility to your criticism. There is nothing to be ashamed of, and so there
is no need to bounce your criticism off Jonathan or Jonathanians, or to preface
such criticism with a preemptory jab at Jonathanians in order not to be called
a “wailer.”
7. Do not defend the president by blaming
civil servants or political appointees for missteps by the government. The buck
stops at the president’s desk. If a document goes out in the name of his
administration or is presented to the national assembly by him, it is his
document. He owns it. He should have read it or caused a thorough reading to be
done by his aides. If the said document proves to be a harvest of scandalous
provisions and allocations, his ineptitude and naivety in that particular
circumstance are indefensible and cannot be fobbed off to aides or civil servants.
8. Do not defend the president by always
assuming that people are out to get him. It is a paranoid mindset that will
produce irrational, unconvincing, and in some cases deceptive defences of the
president’s actions. You do not own Buhari. He is public property who must be
subjected to the crucible of public evaluation. Even if some people do not wish
him well, he is a tough politician and knows the terrain. He can handle himself
and does not need fanatically defensive supporters.
9. Do not dismiss the groaning of those who
complain that Buhari’s change has not reached them or is too slow to manifest.
It is their suffering that is talking, and it is callous and mean-spirited to
dismiss their anguish in order to protect Buhari.
10. Do not attribute the president’s failures
to a systemic rot. This is a cop out. This is his second stint as the leader of
the country. He is a grown man, and an elder statesman to boot. He knew what he
was getting into and was intimately familiar with the system he was campaigning
to superintend. It is not your job to cover him with the blanket of sympathy or
pity when he willfully and loudly proclaimed himself capable of wading through
the systemic rot to implement a change agenda.
In conclusion, the best way to defend the
president is to begin from a premise that the failures and disappointments for
which he is being blamed and criticised are real. The next step is to help the
president make amends and correct his course. Being too defensive will only
increase the pressure on the president.
*Moses Ochonu, a professor of his history, can be reached at meochonu@gmail.com
Well argued piece. President Buhari will soon realise that his greatest enemies are, perhaps, not the "wailing wailers" but the countless e-rats they have unleashed on various e-forums to abuse and malign those who evem mildly criticise him. These same people they are maligning for their well-meaning inputs may have voted for him and are the same people whose votes the APC would be asking for in 2019.
ReplyDeleteGreat article, but will Buhari and the APC hear? Will Lai Mohammed hear? Buhari's defenders and unduly negative and offensive. I can guess that everyday, Buhari loses some supporters because of them
ReplyDeleteMy sentiments exactly!
ReplyDelete