By Chinweizu
Part II of “2015-- Between
Liberation and Slavery (3)”
Copyright © by Chinweizu, 2015
31jan15
A contribution to the Abuja symposium on “NATIONAL
CONFAB AND THE 2015 GENERAL ELECTIONS” on
MONDAY, 2ND FEBRUARY 2015
VENUE: LAGOS/OSUN
HALL, TRANSCORP HILTON HOTEL
-----------------------------
===========================================
2015 Presidential Election Issues
After that historical backgrounder,
I shall now examine 4 election issues, the two on everybody’s mind —Corruption
and Insecurity, with insecurity in the two forms of Boko Haram and The Fulani
militia, plus two others that are not but should be on everybody’s mind namely,
the 1999 Constitution—hereafter referred to as the Constitution; and Candidate
Buhari. So all in all I shall examine 5
distinct election issues: Corruption; Boko Haram; The Fulani Militia; the 1999
Constitution; Candidate Buhari.
------------------------------------------------
1] On Corruption, I submit that,
under the Constitution, no President of Nigeria can tackle corruption without
inviting impeachment, simply because corruption is encouraged and protected by
the constitution which he is sworn to enforce.
2] On Boko Haram, I submit that it
is partly funded through the structures of the Constitution and can’t be
extinguished without first discarding the Constitution. I also submit that a
military solution to Boko Haram is not possible under the Constitution.
3] On The Fulani Militia, I submit
that it is an ethnic cleansing and land grabbing instrument of the Caliphate
and a mortal danger to all other Nigerians, and that it can’t be curbed under
the Constitution.
4] On the Constitution, I submit
that it is the godfather of corruption, as well as the codification of the
sources of all the vices that plague Nigeria, and that Nigeria cannot be
reformed without discarding it. Though ostensibly democratic, its frauds make
it a fake-democracy constitution.
5] On Candidate Buhari, I submit
that he has neither the will nor the ability to discard the Constitution but
has every reason to perpetuate it. Accordingly he can’t solve any of the
problems whose solution requires discarding the Constitution. So, those who
expect him to change Nigeria by solving these problems are taking themselves
for a ride.
From these submissions I argue that
because these top problems—Corruption, Insecurity in its Boko Haram and Fulani
Militia forms--- can be solved only after scrapping the Constitution; so, the
principal election issue becomes the Constitution itself and how to replace
it. Hence, this election should be
decided by the answer the candidates give to just one question: What’s your program
for replacing the Constitution?
*President Jonathan
-------------------
1] Corruption;
On Corruption, I submit that, under
the Constitution, no President of Nigeria can tackle corruption without
inviting impeachment, simply because corruption is encouraged and protected by
the constitution which he is sworn to enforce. Here is why.
First of all, let’s get
terminologically accurate. What we call “corruption” in Nigeria is actually
lootocracy—the government of the people, by organized crime syndicates or
mafias a.k.a. political parties, for the looting of the treasury.
Secondly, the 1999 Constitution has
entrenched and institutionalized lootocracy. The constitution, by its so-called
security vote together with its immunity clause for the top office holders,
effectively invites them to loot with impunity. And, naturally, what the top
officers of the state do, their subordinates emulate.
During
the National Dialogue, in my piece in the Guardian
titled “Four reasons to scrap the 1999 Constitution”, I pointed out that the
1999 Constitution is the godfather of corruption, through the immunity clause
308. (1), which protects, and thereby implicitly invites, looting by the
highest officials who have brazenly set the terrible example that the rest of
society have emulated. However, it ostentatiously declares in Section 14. (5)
that ‘The State shall abolish all corrupt practices and abuse of power’, thus
giving the impression that it is for fighting corruption. But it then
surreptitiously annuls Section 14. (5) by section 6. (6)(c), its ouster clause.
It is a fraud for the godfather of corruption to give the impression that it is
against corruption, and the fraud is compounded when it empowers the state to
fight corruption but then surreptitiously discourages it from doing so. That’s
double duplicity!
Because of this fraud of an ouster,
which makes non justiciable its provision that “The State shall abolish all corrupt practices and abuse of
power”, so long as we have that
constitution, nobody can end lootocracy.
That fraud aside, the cost of
seeking office under the system created
by the 1999 Constitution is so high that only looters or those sponsored by and
beholden to looters (godfathers) can seek election to any public office at any
level—LGA, state, or federal . And Nigerians expect them to end looting after
they are elected? You got to be out of your mind or just fooling yourself!
Given that the Constitution has
entrenched and institutionalized lootocracy by these devices, if a
president--who is sworn to uphold the constitution--attempts to fight
lootocracy, he would be breaking his oath of office and inviting impeachment.
The fact of life is that Nigerians
live by “corruption”, they grow rich by “corruption”, or aspire to do so
whenever they get the opportunity. At donation time, they celebrate the looters
who donate to their causes. And, contradictorily, they can’t do without the
pleasure of complaining about “corruption”. That daily ritual is part of their
daily entertainment and frustration reliever. For these reasons, any
anti-corruption talk in Nigeria is either a joke or a scam.
*Gen Buhari
As far as the political charade is
concerned, anybody who wants to get into office and loot the state coffers knows
that the easy way to excite and dupe the voters is to pose as an
anti-corruption fighter. But when he gets there, as he already knows, he can’t
do anything about it because the constitution has entrenched and given
protection to “corruption”. Because of the constitutional obstacle to
eliminating “corruption”, it should not be an issue in any Nigerian election.
It is a false issue, a problem that no candidate or party can do anything
about. Their making an issue of it is like cripples boasting about which of
them can run a mile in four minutes. In election contests, it should be removed
and replaced with the issue of what to do about the fraudulent constitution
that protects “corruption”.
The tragedy is that even those who
want a True Federalism Constitution, TFC, didn’t do enough, especially during
the National Dialogue, to make the 1999 Constitution the main issue in the
public mind. So, “corruption” continues to obsess the public, and regardless of
who Jega’s INEC proclaims the winner, the lootocracy is safe, and the looting
will go on, and on and on, and so too the clamor against “corruption”, until
Nigerians get tired of the charade and face the reality that the 1999
Constitution must be removed as the first step if lootcracy is to be tamed.
Hence, anybody who thinks that,
under Nigeria’s 1999 Constitution, any government, party or president can
eradicate corruption is like a man who expects a worm to give birth to a lion,
or who wants to go to heaven but doesn’t want to die.
----------------------------------------
2] Boko Haram
On Boko Haram, I submit that it is
partly funded through the structures of the Constitution and can’t be
extinguished without first discarding the Constitution. I also submit that a
military solution to Boko Haram is not possible under the Constitution.
Who gave Boko Haram to
Nigeria?
In 2012,
we got this statement from Mustapha Jokolo, the former No 2 man in the
Caliphate system:
Northern politicians created Boko Haram – Mustapha Jokolo, former
Emir of Gwandu
http://elombah.com/index.php/articles-mainmenu/10385-northern-politicians-created-boko-harammustapha-jokolo-former-emir-of-gwandu Published on Friday, 30 March 2012 11:46
The Constitution helps to support
the Boko Haram insurgency. How?
The Constitution helps to fund Boko
Haram through the federal funding of the Shariya states and their governors.
Being the governors of Shariyaland states, their sympathies are with Boko Haram
which is campaigning for implementation of Shari’a. How much of these funds end
up in Boko Haram hands needs to be investigated.
Can Boko Haram be defeated under
the Constitution? Probably not, because by the structures and provisions of the
Constitution,
1: the governments of the
Shariyaland states will get statutory budget allocations which the Boko Haram
sponsors among them can divert to their terrorist agency—Boko Haram.
2: The fifth column of Boko Haram
sympathizers from those states will remain part of the Nigerian military, and
will continue, from the inside, to sabotage military operations against Boko
Haram as in this report by London based EAGLE EYE REPORT
WORLDWIDE:
The apprehension and detention of
9 northern generals for supporting
the northern
insurgents has grave implications for Nigeria that makes irrelevant all talk of
any election by the politicians for April 2015. The Nigerian Army can't last as
a cohesive organization for much longer.
The Junior northern officers are actively planning a
coup because they know that the courtmarshal process of those 9 Gambari
generals will invariably affect them also as they will be implicated for
following direct orders of those generals.
The punishment for charge of mutiny, sabotage, treason
etc charges laid against these 9 courtmashaled generals in military tribunals
is usually firing squad just like coup.
--THE ECDYSIS OF
BOKO HARAM MODUS OPEREANDI ANOTHER MIRAGE; EAGLE EYE
REPORT WORLDWIDE Tuesday, May 20, 2014
3: The Boko Haram sponsors who are embedded in
all levels of the Nigerian state apparatus will continue to obstruct efforts to
politically defeat Boko Haram, and will supply intelligence to Boko Haram. As
President Jonathan revealed back in 2012:
“Boko Haram is
everywhere, in the executive arm of government, in the legislative arm of
government and even in the judiciary. Some are also in the armed forces, the
police and other security agencies,” Jonathan said. “Some continue to dip their
hands and eat with you and you won’t even know the person who will point a gun
at you or plant a bomb behind your house.”
President: Boko Haram has infiltrated govt, military, http://www.thenationonlineng.net/2011/index.php/news/32611-president-boko-haram-has-infiltrated-govt-military.html 09/01/2012; (Accessed Oct 2012)
Part
of Nigeria’s difficulty in solving the Boko Haram problem is that Shariyaland
has a pervasive fifth column within the Nigerian government and political
parties. This fifth column is aiding and abetting Boko Haram; it consists of
Shariyaland citizens who are holding positions in Nigerian governments and
political parties, all the way from the Vice Presidency to party members in
both the ruling PDP and the opposition APC. It includes the governors and NASS
legislators from Shariyaland; it includes Shariyaland personnel in the security
forces (Police, Army, Navy, Air Force, Intelligence Agencies, Customs,
Immigration etc.) in the media, the economy, etc.
(pix:cfr)
*A church building is bombed
Can you imagine Britain
winning its war against Germany if it had in its cabinet, parliament, armed
forces, media, banks, civil service, and every institution of British life, a
huge fifth column of Germans loyal to Hitler and organized to assist Hitler?
Or
can you imagine Abraham Lincoln winning the US civil war if his Vice President
was a Confederate politician, his cabinet included Confederate men, the
Congress still included Confederate legislators, and the Union Army was full of
Confederate generals and soldiers?
That is the fundamental anomaly that Nigeria must rectify if
it is to respond correctly to Boko Haram.
And that rectification requires abrogation of the 1999 Constitution.
A political solution is not
possible under the Constitution because it would require the stopping of
funding to the states of Shariyaland, and that would be unconstitutional.
Even a military solution is not
possible under the Constitution. Why?
Under the Constitution, any army sent to fight Boko Haram will contain Muslim
officers and men who have religious sympathies for Boko Haram, and who will see
it as their religious duty to sabotage operations. To keep them out of the army
would be impossible under the Constitution. Hence both a military and a
political solution would require scrapping the Constitution.
-----------------
3] The Fulani militia
On the Fulani Militia, I submit
that it is an ethnic cleansing and land grabbing instrument of the Caliphate
and a mortal danger to all other Nigerians, and that it can’t be curbed under
the Constitution.
Attacks by these well-armed
Fulani herdsmen have been reported in Oyo, Ogun, Plateau, Benue, Abia and other
states. The cows they are rearing belong to the Caliphate magnates including
the Sultan, emirs, governors, ministers, senior military men and high
government official. The Sultan of Sokoto is the Chairman of the Board of trustees
of MACBAN, the Cattle Breeders Association which is behind the Fulani herders
and their Militia. MACBAN has invoked the freedom of movement sections of the
Constitution to support the freedom of its cattle herders to trespass upon and
destroy farms in their search for pasture for their cattle. Furthermore, there
is a bill—the National Grazing Routes or Reserves bill, which seeks to carve
out grazing lands for Fulani herdsmen in each state in Nigeria. Even while the
bill is yet to become law, the Fulani Militia is already unilaterally enforcing
it. The Fulani Militia is Nigeria’s
equivalent of the ethnic-cleansing Janjawid of Darfur.
The Fulani Militia cannot be curbed
under the constitution whereby their grazing reserves are to be set up. So long
as the Constitution remains, the menace of the Fulani Militia is unlikely to be
curbed.
---------------------
4] The Constitution:
On the Constitution, I submit that
it is the godfather of corruption, as well as the codification of the sources
of all the vices that plague Nigeria, and that Nigeria cannot be reformed
without discarding it. Though ostensibly democratic, its frauds make it a
fake-democracy constitution.
As I showed during the National Dialogue, in
my piece in the Guardian titled “Four
reasons to scrap 1999 Constitution”, it
contains at least four frauds and is probably the most fraudulent constitution
in the world. These fatal
frauds are: the “We the people” fraud; the “Federation” fraud; the “Fighting
corruption” masquerade/fraud; and the “Socially responsible State”
masquerade/fraud. That piece can be consulted in the Guardian of November 6 and 7, 2013. I
further submit that Nigeria cannot be reformed without discarding the 1999
Constitution. That’s because these
frauds make it impossible to legally compel the Nigerian state to execute any
of its duties to the citizens. Any measure to reform Nigeria would require
legally forcing the State to implement constitutional duties that it is already
licensed to ignore.
You need to find out who cooked up and
imposed this constitution and why. Now, this 1999 Constitution is the mature
version of the 1979 constitution. Its 1979 prototype was cooked up by two
Caliphate agents, the now late Chief Rotimi Williams, a.k.a “Timi the Law,” and
Prof Ben Nwabueze. The mature version of 1999 was finalized and polished up by
a Caliphate man, Prof Yadudu, and imposed by Decree by another Caliphate agent,
Gen. Abdusalami Abubakar . Why was it cooked up with so many frauds and other
devices that serve the Caliphate? The
Caliphate hates democracy, hates free and fair elections, that’s why. It only
likes elections that it rigs in advance, so it is sure to win and hang on to
power. That was why Sultan Dasuki organized the annulment of the June 12
election--the most free and fair election in Nigeria’s history. And after aborting democracy in 1993, the
Caliphate cooked up this fraudulent Constitution so it can avoid any real
democracy in the future. It is very cleverly fixed up so the Caliphate can use
it to dominate and loot Nigeria forever.
Like most Nigerians, you probably think that IBB annulled the June 12
election. He didn’t, Sultan Dasuki did. MKO Abiola, the winner of June 12 and
IBB, the organizer of that impressive transition program, were both victims of
June 12. One of the Caliphate agents who helped to get the annulment
accomplished was the then General David Mark who is now Senator David Mark, the
Senate president. He was the one who
threatened and said “ I’d shoot Chief Abiola the day NEC pronounces him the elected
President.” Go and ask him. If he
denies it, call in Prof Omo Omoruyi and IBB to expose him. The Caliphate’s idea
of democracy was summed up by Aminu Saleh, a Secretary to the Government of the
Federation, SGF, under Abacha, who told Prof Omoruyi: “Professor, my vote is not the same
weight as the vote of the Emir of Bauchi and the vote of the Emir of Bauchi is
not the same weight as the vote of the Sultan of Sokoto” He then said “that is
why we are not going to accept the mandate which Chief Abiola is claiming”. . .
. Abiola’s mandate was, of course, based on the principle of
one-person-one vote which the Caliphate hates like the devil hates holy water.
If you want to be educated on the Caliphate’s incurable hatred for democracy,
the book to read is Prof Omo Omruyi’s The
Tale of June 12. I am bringing up all that just to indicate how much the
Caliphate hates democracy and hates free and fair elections, and to give you
the reason why they cooked up this fraudulent anti-democracy constitution. And
when you gather to draft a True Federalism Constitution, make sure that the
likes of “Timi the Law”, Prof Nwabueze and Prof Yadudu are far from the hall,
lest they pollute the Peoples ‘ True Federalism Constitution with clever
anti-the-People frauds.
---------
(pix:DailyTimes)
5] Candidate Buhari:
On Candidate Buhari, I submit that he has
neither the will nor the ability to discard the Constitution but has every
reason to perpetuate it. Accordingly he can’t solve any of the problems whose
solution requires discarding the Constitution. So, those who expect him to
change Nigeria by solving these problems are taking themselves for a ride. Why?
We shall consider two questions
about Candidate Buhari: His posturing as
a born-again democrat, and his ability to fight Boko Haram.
After he lost the 2011 election,
Buhari told the world that should he be declared the loser in 2015, monkey and
baboon will be soaked in blood. That is to say, if the voters do not elect him
he will unleash violence on them. Now is that a democrat’s position? Consider an election where the voters go to
the polls with one of the candidates holding a gun to their heads and saying
“vote for me or you are dead”. Would such an election be free and fair? The wonder
is that INEC went ahead to approve a candidate who has publicly threatened
massive violence if he is not declared elected.
The second wonder is that the International Community has passed over
Buhari’s threat without taking any action. What has Jimmy Carter and his Carter
Center said or done about this threat to a free and fair election? Why is Buhari not in the dock in De Hague
facing trial for making threats of post- election violence? If Gbagbo was taken to De Hague, and Uhuru
Kenyatta too, why not Buhari? Is the International Community not interested in
preventive action? Is it waiting for people to be slaughtered before feeling
obliged to do something? Given his tyrannical actions when he was military Head
of State in the 1980s, and now his threat of post-election violence, Buhari can’t
be the democrat he is pretending to be. Anybody who is inclined to accept
Buhari’s posturing should be reminded of the Chinese saying: Fool me once,
shame on you; fool me twice shame on me.
Buhari and Boko Haram
Candidate Buhari is creating the
impression that he will fight, and knows how to fight, Boko Haram. But will
Buhari really fight Boko Haram?
I think not. Because, (a) Buhari is the Boko
Haram candidate ; (b1) Buhari’s agenda and Boko Haram’s are the same—Islamizing
all of Nigeria; and (b2) their attitude to the Sultan and emirs is the same.
And (c) Boko Haram and Buhari are sponsored by the same Northern politicians.
(a) Boko
Haram is supporting its candidate Buhari by escalating its attacks in the run
up to the elections, so as to demonstrate that the Jonathan administration
hasn’t succeeding in ending the Boko Haram insurgency, and implying that
Buhari, therefore, should get a chance to become President and try. They are
trying to shape opinion in favor of their preferred candidate for President.
(b1) They both want Shari’a in all the states in Nigeria. Buhari said
so back in 2001,
Buhari Calls for Sharia in All States http://allafrica.com/stories/200108270355.html ; and
Boko Haram
said the same in 201: Boko Haram to FG
"Total Shari'a in Nigeria or no Peace"
...Says Qur'an is Above Nigerian Constitution
http://www.naijapundit.com/news/boko-haram-to-fg-total-shari-a-in-nigeria-or-no-peace (Accessed October
2012)
(b2) Buhari and Boko Haram have the same view of the Sultan and
the emirs. In his October 2011 email, Boko Haram’s Abu Qaqa declared "our
position is that the Sultan is just a traditional ruler who revolted against
the teachings of his ancestors and put the Nigerian Constitution ahead of the
teachings of the Holy Qur’an and the traditions of the Prophet.”
NaijaPundit had earlier published a
leaked wikileaks cable in which the Buhari team had told American Embassy
officials that they had no confidence in the Northern Traditional rulers in
general while naming the Sultan of Sokoto and the emir of Kano specifically as
people who had tried to corrupt the judiciary.
(c) Buhari is the
candidate of the sponsors of Boko Haram. The Arewa Consultative Forum and the
Arewa Elders’ Forum, which have both endorsed Buhari as their candidate, are
leaders of the Northern politicians who, according to Major Jokolo, the former
Emir of Gwandu, are the sponsors of Boko Haram.
Given that their aims, views and
supporters are the same, will Buhari have the will to fight his jihadist Boko
Haram comrades? Does a politician fight his constituency and supporters? Does a
jockey stab the horse he is riding?
Nevertheless Buhari claims he can
end the insurgency. How? Let’s figure it out.
As a political or military solution
is not possible under the Constitution, the only way Buhari can end the Boko
Haram insurgency is to defuse it. And for that he would have to appease them by
destroying the democracy that Boko Haram loathes, and then turn all of Nigeria
into a Shari’a country. In other words, Buhari, if he became president, would
have to become even more jihadist than Boko Haram and become their de facto
political leader. But will the rest of Nigerians, those who want democracy and
loathe Shari’a, put up with that? That
means that Buhari will defuse the Boko Haram insurgency only to ignite a much
bigger civil war between the Jihadists and the rest of Nigerians. Then the war
that’s been confined to the NE zone will be fought everywhere, Muslim against
non-Muslim, neighbor against neighbor. If you are a Nigerian and desire that,
then Buhari is your man.
But let me sound a warning. Buhari
and his Boko Haram supporters would do well to remind themselves that Jihadists
have no monopoly on fanaticism. The historical record shows that Christians may
be slow to be provoked to a Crusade, but when they finally get going, they are
unstoppable. It is then “Onward Christian Soldiers, marching off to war, with
the cross of Jesus going on before.” Buhari and his cohorts should recall how,
after the routing of the Turkish jihadists on Sept 12, 1683 at the siege of
Vienna, the Christian crusaders drove those Jihadists steadily back for
centuries till they not only recovered all the lands previously taken in
Eastern and Central Europe by the Jihadists, but ended up destroying the
Ottoman Caliphate sponsor of that Jihad and, as extra, conquered all the Arab
lands, including the Hejaz, by the end of World War I. That relentless push
back ended two and half centuries after it began in Vienna. Similarly, in the
earlier branch of the Crusades, the one which began after the Arab Jihadist
armies were defeated by Charles Martel at Tours/Poitiers, the Christians ended
up conquering all the Muslim lands in the world, from Morocco to Mindanao in
what became the Philippines.
It is my duty as a historian to
remind the world, and all Jihadists in particular, that the drive that, by
1918, culminated in Western Europe’s conquest of the whole world had its remote
beginnings in Christian Europe’s response to the Jihadist invasion of Spain,
through the Straits of Gibraltar in 711. Some 20 years later, in 732, Charles
Martel defeated those invaders of Europe at the battle of Tours/Poitiers, and
stopped that jihadist push into Europe. But it was not until 1095, nearly four
centuries after the jihadists entered Spain, that Pope Urban II launched the First Crusade.
Strengthened by the crusading spirit, the faltering Christian reconquest of
Spain from Islam was renewed with determination and ferocity. When the momentum
of the Reconquista brought Christian power to Ceuta in 1415, the Reconquista
morphed into Western Europe’s enterprise of expansionism that, by 1918, had
conquered the whole world, including all of Dar-al-Islam, from Morocco to
Mindanao. That’s a crusading drive that
lasted from 1095 to 1918, all of 8 centuries!
On
9/11 Bin Laden’s gang began a fresh jihad against the West. The West has
responded with its War on Terror and is still uncertain and divided on how to
respond. But it is still early days. When they finally organize a coherent
counter-attack, the consequences for Islam could be dire. It could bring about
the liquidation of Islam, its total and final extinction from the face of the
earth. So these 21st century jihadists should warn themselves. In particular, Buhari and his Caliphate and
Boko Haram cohorts, if they are wise, should desist from provoking in Nigeria
the Christian crusader spirit of ‘Onward Christian Soldiers!
-----------------------
From the examination of the above election
issues, can anyone solve the problems of corruption, Boko Haram and the Fulani
Militia? Can Jonathan or Buhari or the
APC or the PDP or any other party or candidate?
Because these major problems can be solved
only after scrapping the Constitution, the principal election issue becomes the
Constitution itself and how to replace it with another that can facilitate
solutions to these problems. If we are
sensible, this election should be decided by the answer the candidates give to
just one question: WHAT’S YOUR PROGRAM
FOR REPLACING THE CONSTITUTION?
Whatever answer he gives, can Buhari replace
the constitution? I think not. Since the
prime interest of his Caliphate constituency is to keep its fraudulent
fake–democracy constitution in operation and use it to dominate and exploit
Nigeria, can you see Buhari honestly proposing or accepting to scrap the
Constitution? As he can’t do the key thing—scrap the constitution-- required to
solve these problems of Nigerians, if you vote for Buhari in the hope that he
can and will solve these problems, you are just a mumu who expects a pig to
fly. That’s my submission, my argument for asking you to vote against Buhari.
Are you a mumu? No? I don’t think you are. But prove it to yourself and the
world: go out in your millions and VOTE AGAINST BUHARI.
Knowing how much the Caliphate
hates democracy, you should be on alert for Caliphate pro-democracy politricks
and conmen. So when a Caliphate man with a track record as a bloody tyrant is
put forward by the Caliphate party, APC; and is publicly backed by the
Caliphate political leadership in the Arewa Consultative Forum, ACF, and the
Northern Elders’ Forum, NEF, you should enjoy their clown show. And when the
candidate starts play acting and posing like a superstar or pop idol of democracy,
you should know to also do a playact support for him, like some tell me they
are doing at his rallies. But when you step into the polling booth, you stop
play acting, get real, and vote against him. Use your votes to keep this conman
Buhari in Daura to enjoy the well-deserved retirement into which IBB sent him
in 1985.
If you are not a mumu please spread
the word to vote against the Caliphate and its conman Candidate Buhari.
Spreading the word to VOTE AGAINST
BUHARI is a vital task of public enlightenment today.
---------------------------------------------
And as my own contribution to this
effort of public enlightenment, I hereby release my 2013 booklet, “Caliphate
Colonialism” from copyright. I thereby waive my author’s royalties so as to
help keep its price low and make it affordable to most Nigerians. That’s my
contribution to the liberation of the New South from Caliphate colonialism. And
I specially invite the members of the Nigerian Book Pirates Association to
publish and distribute it widely, starting yesterday, so every Nigerian
household can buy and read its own copy. Any publisher or person in Nigeria can
do the same. The essay can be downloaded from the Shekere Africa website
through this link.
However, if any of these publishers
should later on wish to contribute towards my medical expenses, that’s a
separate matter, and for their generosity I shall be grateful.
No comments:
Post a Comment